LocusPoint Networks, LLC v. D.T.V. LLC
Filing
22
ORDER RE: JUNE 19, 2014 HEARING AND JURISDICTION. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 6/17/2014. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
LOCUSPOINT NETWORKS, LLC,
Case No. 14-cv-01278-JSC
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER RE: JUNE 19 HEARING AND
JURISDICTION
9
10
D.T.V. LLC,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Plaintiff LocusPoint Networks, LLC (“LPN”) filed this breach of contract action against
14
Defendant D.T.V. LLC (“DTV”) in federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. The Court
15
has an independent obligation to satisfy itself that it has federal subject matter jurisdiction.
16
Valdez v. Allstate Ins. Co., 372 F.3d 1115, 1116 (9th Cir. 2004). Jurisdiction founded on diversity
17
“requires that the parties be in complete diversity and the amount in controversy exceed $75,000.”
18
Matheson v. Progressive Specialty Ins. Co., 319 F.3d 1089, 1090 (9th Cir. 2003). Complete
19
diversity means that “each of the plaintiffs must be a citizen of a different state than each of the
20
defendants.” Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hughes, 358 F.3d 1089, 1095 (9th Cir. 2004). Further, the party
21
asserting diversity jurisdiction bears the burden of proof. Resnik v. La Paz Guest Ranch, 289 F.2d
22
814, 819 (9th Cir. 1961). Generally, LLCs are “citizen[s] of every state in which [their]
23
owners/members are citizens.” Johnson v. Columbia Props. Anchorage, LP, 437 F.3d 894, 899
24
(9th Cir. 2006). Thus, citizenship here is dependent on the citizenship of the parties’
25
owners/members. Although the Complaint alleges that DTV’s sole member is a citizen of South
26
Carolina, the Complaint does not reveal the citizenship of LPN’s members. At the hearing on
27
June 19, 2014, LPN shall be prepared to inform the Court of the citizenship of its members.
28
1
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 17, 2014
______________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?