Bruzzone v. Intel Corporation et al

Filing 128

ORDER by Judge Hamilton denying 123 Motion for "Case Oversight Review". (pjhlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2017)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE,

6
7

Case No. 14-cv-1279-WHA

Plaintiff,

5
v.

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
"CASE OVERSIGHT REVIEW"

INTEL CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Plaintiff Michael A. Bruzzone filed a motion requesting the undersigned District

12

Judge to “reverse, strike, set aside” orders issued by the District Judge assigned to the

13

above-entitled action, and to “reverse” the order dismissing Case No. 16-mc-80233 WHA

14

pursuant to the prefiling order issued in this action on August 19, 2014. The motion is

15

DENIED.

16

There is no provision in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Civil Local

17

Rules that would permit one District Judge of this court to “reverse” an order issued by

18

another District Judge. In particular, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(3), which

19

plaintiff has cited in his motion, does not authorize a litigant to seek such relief.

20

Moreover, the court notes that plaintiff appealed the June 28, 2014 dismissal of this case

21

and the final judgment, which was affirmed by the Ninth Circuit on November 28, 2016.

22

See Bruzzone v. Intel Corp.¸ 670 Fed. Appx. 931 (9th Cir. Nov. 21, 2017).

23

The undersigned will not consider any further motions or requests relating to this

24

case or any other case filed by this plaintiff.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated: May 31, 2017

27
28

__________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge