Bruzzone v. Intel Corporation et al
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION. Signed by Judge Alsup on June 28, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2014)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
INTEL CORPORATION, et al.,
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
No. C 14-01279 WHA
In May 2014, pro se Michael Bruzzone’s complaint was stricken. He was given until
June 4 to file a first amended complaint “or this action will be dismissed” (Dkt. No. 51).
That deadline has passed and plaintiff has failed to file a first amended complaint.
Accordingly, there is no operative complaint in this action.
Michael Bruzzone then filed a motion to disqualify, which was denied by Judge Yvonne
Gonzalez Rogers (Dkt. Nos. 56, 58).
In June 2014, the parties were ordered to show cause why this action should not be
dismissed (Dkt. No. 59). Defendants Intel Corporation and ARM, Inc. stated no objection to
dismissal. Intel, however, has filed a motion to declare Michael Bruzzone a vexatious litigant,
noticed for a hearing on August 14 (Dkt. No. 61). Michael Bruzzone filed a response to the
order to show cause refusing to file a first amended complaint. Since there is no operative
complaint, this action cannot proceed. Judgment shall be entered. Intel’s motion will be
considered in due course.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 28, 2014.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?