Segan LLC v. Zynga Inc.

Filing 104

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 103 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DURIE TANGRI LLP DARALYN J. DURIE (SBN 169825) ddurie@durietangri.com SONALI D. MAITRA (SBN 254896) smaitra@durietangri.com SARAH E. STAHNKE (SBN 264838) sstahnke@durietangri.com 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-362-6666 Facsimile: 415-236-6300 Attorneys for Defendant ZYNGA INC. 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 SEGAN LLC, 13 14 15 16 17 Case No. 3:14-cv-01315-VC Plaintiff, v. ZYNGA INC. Defendant. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ZYNGA INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS: DOCKET ITEM NOS. 94-5 AND 99-11 Ctrm: 4, 17th Floor Judge: Honorable Vince Chhabria 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ZYNGA INC.’S MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS: DOCKET ITEM NOS. 94-5 AND 99-11 / CASE NO. 3:14-CV01315-VC 1 Defendant Zynga Inc. (“Zynga”) has moved this Court to remove incorrectly filed documents, 2 Docket Nos 94-5 and 99-11 which contain confidential information concerning Zynga’s percentage of 3 revenues derived from the Accused Games at issue in this case. 4 Having considered the papers submitted, and finding good cause therefor, 5 The Court hereby GRANTS Zynga’s Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Documents, Docket 6 7 8 Nos 94-5 and 99-11 and orders that they be removed from the publicly available docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _____________ 2014 November 14, ________________________________________ HONORABLE VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ZYNGA INC.’S MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS: DOCKET ITEM NOS. 94-5 AND 99-11 / CASE NO. 3:14-CV01315-VC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?