Segan LLC v. Zynga Inc.
Filing
104
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 103 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DURIE TANGRI LLP
DARALYN J. DURIE (SBN 169825)
ddurie@durietangri.com
SONALI D. MAITRA (SBN 254896)
smaitra@durietangri.com
SARAH E. STAHNKE (SBN 264838)
sstahnke@durietangri.com
217 Leidesdorff Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415-362-6666
Facsimile:
415-236-6300
Attorneys for Defendant
ZYNGA INC.
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
SEGAN LLC,
13
14
15
16
17
Case No. 3:14-cv-01315-VC
Plaintiff,
v.
ZYNGA INC.
Defendant.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT ZYNGA INC.’S NOTICE OF
MOTION AND MOTION TO REMOVE
INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS:
DOCKET ITEM NOS. 94-5 AND 99-11
Ctrm: 4, 17th Floor
Judge: Honorable Vince Chhabria
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ZYNGA INC.’S MOTION TO REMOVE
INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS: DOCKET ITEM NOS. 94-5 AND 99-11 / CASE NO. 3:14-CV01315-VC
1
Defendant Zynga Inc. (“Zynga”) has moved this Court to remove incorrectly filed documents,
2
Docket Nos 94-5 and 99-11 which contain confidential information concerning Zynga’s percentage of
3
revenues derived from the Accused Games at issue in this case.
4
Having considered the papers submitted, and finding good cause therefor,
5
The Court hereby GRANTS Zynga’s Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Documents, Docket
6
7
8
Nos 94-5 and 99-11 and orders that they be removed from the publicly available docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: _____________ 2014
November 14,
________________________________________
HONORABLE VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT ZYNGA INC.’S MOTION TO REMOVE
INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS: DOCKET ITEM NOS. 94-5 AND 99-11 / CASE NO. 3:14-CV01315-VC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?