Segan LLC v. Zynga Inc.
Filing
148
ORDER by Judge Vince Chhabria denying 116 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting 121 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; finding as moot 126 Stipulation; granting 132 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 140 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
SEGAN LLC,
Case No. 14-cv-01315-VC
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO
SEAL
9
10
ZYNGA INC,
Re: Dkt. Nos. 116, 121, 126, 132, and 140
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Zynga's administrative motion to seal in connection with its opposition to Segan's motion
13
to amend (Dkt. No. 121), and Segan's administrative motion to seal its amended infringement
14
contentions (Dkt. No. 132) are granted. The parties established good cause for sealing the material
15
and abided by the local rules.
16
Segan's administrative motion to seal in connection with its motion to amend (Dkt. No.
17
116) is denied because of failure to comply with Local Rule 79-5(e). Segan's corrected
18
administrative motion to seal in connection with its reply brief to the motion to amend (Dkt. No.
19
140) is denied because of failure to comply with Local Rule 79-5(e) and because the motion is not
20
narrowly tailored to seal only the sealable material. The parties have seven days from the date of
21
this Order to refile these motions in accordance with the local rules. Otherwise, the material will
22
be made public.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Segan's initial administrative motion to seal in connection with its reply brief (Dkt. No.
126) is terminated as moot because it is superseded by Docket No. 140.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 5, 2015
______________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?