Segan LLC v. Zynga Inc.

Filing 155

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 154 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Scheduling of Settlement Conference filed by Segan LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 2/18/15. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BLANK ROME LLP Naki Margolis, Esq. (SBN 94120) Nmargolis@Blankrome.com 601 Montgomery Street, Suite 2030 San Francisco, CA 94111 Phone: 415.986.2144 Facsimile: 415.986.4461 Victor M. Wigman, Esq. Charles R. Wolfe, Jr. Esq. Brian Wm. Higgins, Esq. Nicholas M. Nyemah, Esq. (SBN 274550) 600 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20037 Phone: 202.772.5800 David A. Dorey, Esq. 1201 Market Street, Suite 800 Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: 302.425.6400 11 12 13 14 15 16 Attorneys for PLAINTIFF, SEGAN LLC DURIE TANGRI LLP Sonali D. Maitra (SBN 254896) Sarah E. Stahnke (SBN 264838) 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415.362.6666 Facsimile: 415.236.6300 17 18 Attorneys for DEFENDANT ZYNGA, INC. 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 21 22 24 25 Case No. 3:14-cv-01315-VC SEGAN LLC, 23 Paintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR SCHEDULING OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE v. ZYNGA, INC. 26 Defendant. Judge: Honorable Kandis A. Westmore 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR SCHEDULING OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 136789.00101/36432891v.1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 By Settlement Conference Order dated October 10, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore scheduled a second, follow-up settlement conference in this matter (after holding an initial conference on October 10, 2014) for December 19, 2014. (Dkt. No. 82). On December 11, 2014, this Court granted the parties’ stipulated request to postpone the December 19 settlement conference, and ordered the parties to contact Judge Westmore’s Chambers no later than 60 days after the close of fact discovery (i.e., by February 16, 2015) to identify a future date to reschedule the settlement conference. (Dkt. No. 115). Presently, the parties are in the process of briefing claim construction and a motion for summary judgment, and those matters are scheduled for oral argument before Judge Chhabria on April 1, 2015. The parties believe that Judge Chhabria’s ruling concerning claim construction and summary judgment may resolve significant disagreements between the parties concerning material elements of the case. Under the circumstances, and pursuant to Dkt. No. 115, the parties agree and jointly propose the following, subject to Court approval: 1. The settlement conference will remain adjourned until Judge Chhabria issues a ruling on claim construction and summary judgment, following the April 1 argument. 2. The parties will confer and contact Judge Westmore’s chambers about the continuation of settlement discussions no later than thirty (30) days after Judge Chhabria issues a ruling on claim construction and summary judgment. 22 23 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR SCHEDULING OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 136789.00101/36432891v.1 2 1 DATED: February 13, 2015 /s/ Nicholas M. Nyemah Nicholas M. Nyemah Attorney for Plaintiff Segan LLC DATED: February 13, 2015 /s/ Sarah E. Stahnke Sarah E. Stahnke Attorney for Defendant Zynga, Inc. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 FILER’S ATTESTATION 9 10 11 12 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, Nicholas M. Nyemah, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 13 14 DATED: February 13, 2015 15 /s/ Nicholas M. Nyemah Nicholas M. Nyemah Attorney for Plaintiff Segan LLC 16 17 18 [PROPOSED] ORDER 19 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 2/18/15 DATED: ______________ 23 ______________________________ Honorable Kandis A. Westmore United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR SCHEDULING OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 136789.00101/36432891v.1 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?