Petzilla, Inc. v. Anser Innovation LLC
Filing
49
STIPULATION AND ORDER Case Management Statement due by 10/2/2014. Case Management Conference set for 10/9/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/25/14. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2014)
Case3:14-cv-01354-EMC Document48 Filed08/21/14 Page1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
NICOLAS S. GIKKAS (SBN 189452)
THE GIKKAS LAW FIRM
530 Lytton Avenue
2nd Floor
Palo Alto, California 94301
Phone: (650) 617-3419
Facsimile: (650) 618-2600
Email: nsg@gikkaslaw.com
KIEUN SUNG-IKEGAMI (SBN 211762)
JON IKEGAMI (SBN 211766)
INNOVATION COUNSEL LLP
2880 Lakeside Drive
Suite 200
Santa Clara, California 95054
Phone: (408) 331-1670
Facsimile: (408) 638-0326
Email: jsung@innovationcounsel.com
jikegami@innovationcounsel.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PETZILLA, INC.
MICHAEL F. HEAFEY (State Bar No. 153499)
mheafey@kslaw.com
GEORGE R. MORRIS (State Bar No. 249930)
gmorris@kslaw.com
King & Spalding LLP
601 S. California Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: 1 650 422 6700
Facsimile: 1 650 422 6800
GRANT D. FAIRBAIRN (admitted pro hac vice)
gfairbairn@fredlaw.com
Fredrikson Byron, P.A.
200 South Sixth Street
Suite 4000
Minneapolis, MN 55402-1425
Telephone: 1 612 492 7000
Facsimile: 1 612 492 7077
Attorneys for Defendant
ANSER INNOVATION LLC
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULES 6-2 AND 7-12
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-01354-EMC
Case3:14-cv-01354-EMC Document48 Filed08/21/14 Page2 of 4
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
4
5
PETZILLA, INC. a Delaware Corporation, d/b/a
Petzila
6
7
8
9
10
Case No. 3:14-cv-01354-EMC
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE
OF THE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL
RULES 6-2(a) AND 7-12
Plaintiff,
v.
ANSER INNOVATION LLC, a Minnesota
limited liability company,
Defendant.
11
12
Plaintiff Petzilla, Inc. (“Petzilla”) and Defendant Anser Innovation LLC (“Anser”) file
13
this stipulation pursuant to Local Civil Rules 6-2 and 7-12 to request that the Court enter an
14
order continuing the initial Case Management Conference (“CMC”) (currently set for September
15
4, 2014, see Dkt. No. 30) until October 9, 2014. The parties likewise request an order extending
16
the deadline for the joint case management conference statement (currently set for August 28,
17
2014) until October 2, 2014.
18
The parties make this request to allow the Court time to consider Anser’s pending Motion
19
Pursuant To Rule 12(b)(2) To Dismiss For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction (“Motion to Dismiss”)
20
(Dkt. No. 34) before engaging in scheduling issues. The hearing on Anser’s Motion to Dismiss
21
is set for August 28, 2014, which is the current deadline for the joint case management
22
conference statement and one week before the initial CMC. The parties agree that, under the
23
circumstances of this case, it is appropriate to postpone the CMC by one month. If the Court
24
grants the Motion, this case will end and there will be no need for the CMC. If the Court denies
25
the Motion, the CMC will occur only one month later than currently scheduled.
26
The Court previously continued the CMC from June 19, 2014 to September 4, 2014.
27
(Dkt. No. 30.) At the time of that continuance, however, the parties had not yet agreed on a
28
2
STIPULATION FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULES 6-2 AND 7-12
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-01354-EMC
Case3:14-cv-01354-EMC Document48 Filed08/21/14 Page3 of 4
1
hearing date for the Motion to Dismiss. Now that the hearing on the Motion is set for August 28,
2
2014, the parties agree that the most efficient course is to further continue the initial CMC. The
3
parties have not yet had any discussions toward developing a schedule, and the requested time
4
modification will not impact the schedule for the case because there are no other pending
5
deadlines beyond those related to the CMC.
6
For the foregoing reasons, Petzilla and Anser request an order continuing the initial CMC
7
until October 9, 2014 and the deadline for the joint case management conference statement until
8
October 2, 2014.
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
DATED: ____August 21, 2014______
__/s/ Nicolas S. Gikkas__________________
NICOLAS S. GIKKAS (SBN 189452)
THE GIKKAS LAW FIRM
530 Lytton Avenue
2nd Floor
Palo Alto, California 94301
Phone: (650) 617-3419
Facsimile: (650) 618-2600
Email: nsg@gikkaslaw.com
21
KIEUN SUNG-IKEGAMI (SBN 211762)
JON IKEGAMI (SBN 211766)
INNOVATION COUNSEL LLP
2880 Lakeside Drive
Suite 200
Santa Clara, California 95054
Phone: (408) 331-1670
Facsimile: (408) 638-0326
Email: jsung@innovationcounsel.com
22
jikegami@innovationcounsel.com
17
18
19
20
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULES 6-2 AND 7-12
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-01354-EMC
Case3:14-cv-01354-EMC Document48 Filed08/21/14 Page4 of 4
1
DATED: ____ August 21, 2014______
2
3
4
5
__/s/ Grant D. Fairbairn__________________
MICHAEL F. HEAFEY (State Bar No. 153499)
mheafey@kslaw.com
GEORGE R. MORRIS (State Bar No. 249930)
gmorris@kslaw.com
King & Spalding LLP
601 S. California Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: 1 650 422 6700
Facsimile: 1 650 422 6800
6
GRANT D. FAIRBAIRN (admitted pro hac vice)
gfairbairn@fredlaw.com
Fredrikson Byron, P.A.
200 South Sixth Street
Suite 4000
Minneapolis, MN 55402-1425
7
8
9
10
Telephone: 1 612 492 7000
Facsimile: 1 612 492 7077
11
12
13
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
DATED: ________________________
8/25/14
_____________________________________
17
18
19
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULES 6-2 AND 7-12
CASE NO. 3:14-CV-01354-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?