Smith v. Colvin

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Plaintiff's Time to File Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Anne M Smith. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/4/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2014)

Case3:14-cv-01413-EMC Document18 Filed10/30/14 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5

David J. Linden
Attorney at Law
CSBN 41221
Post Office Box 5780
Napa, CA 94581
Tel. [phone]
Fax. [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff, Heidi G. Ildefonso

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

ANNE M. SMITH,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner )
)
of Social Security,
)
Defendant
)
)
)

Case No. 3:14-cv-01413-EMC
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER
EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE
PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION
TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

17
18
19

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective

20

counsel, and subject to the approval of the Court, that the plaintiff’s time to file her Reply to

21

Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary

22

Judgment herein is hereby extended for a period of 30 days. Plaintiff’s Reply is due to be filed

23

November 7, 2014. Because of workload in other matters, plaintiff's attorney is unable to meet

24

that deadline. With this stipulation and order plaintiff’s time to file is extended to Monday,

25

December 8, 2014.
Smith v. Colvin, Case 3:14-cv-01413-EMC, Stipulation and Order Extending
Plaintiff’s Time to File Reply- 1

Case3:14-cv-01413-EMC Document18 Filed10/30/14 Page2 of 2

1
2
3

This is plaintiff’s first request for an extension to file her reply.

4
5
6

Dated: ___October 30, 2014__

/s/ David J. Linden
DAVID J. LINDEN
Attorney at Law
Attorney for Plaintiff

7
8
9
10
11

Dated:

October 30, 2014

/s/ Tova Wolking
[Authorized via electronic mail 10/30/2014]
TOVA WOLKING
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Of Attorneys for Defendant

12
13
14
15
16
17

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.
18

FO

ER

A

H

25

R NIA

Dated: __________________ __________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
hen
rd M. C
ge Edwa
Jud

RT

24

ERED

NO

23

O ORD
IT IS S

LI

22

UNIT
ED

21

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

20

S

19

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

Smith v. Colvin, Case 3:14-cv-01413-EMC, Stipulation and Order Extending
Plaintiff’s Time to File Reply- 2