Hendrickson v. Octagon, Inc.
Filing
148
ORDER RE CONDITIONAL STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. PROC. 41(A)(2). Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/9/2018. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
MARIA C. RODRIGUEZ (SBN 194201)
mcrodriguez@mwe.com
MICHELLE S. STROWHIRO (SBN 271969)
mstrowhiro@mwe.com
McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
2049 Century Park East
Suite 3800
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3218
Telephone:
+1 310 277 4110
Facsimile:
+1 310 277 4730
6
7
Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Claimant
OCTAGON, INC.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
DOUGLAS HENDRICKSON, an
individual,
12
LOS ANGELES
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP
10
CASE NO. 14-cv-01416-CRB
Hon. Charles R. Breyer
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
OCTAGON, INC., a Washington, D.C.
corporation,
16
17
Defendant.
OCTAGON, INC., a Washington, D.C.
corporation,,
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONDITIONAL
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV.
PROC. 41(A)(2)
Complaint Filed: February 21, 2014
Trial Date: None Set
[Filed concurrently with: Conditional
Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice]
18
Counter-Claimant,
19
v.
20
21
DOUGLAS HENDRICKSON, an
individual,
Counter-Defendant,
22
and
23
24
25
RELATIVITY SPORTS, LLC, A
DELAWARE CORPORATION,
Counter-Defendants.
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 14-CV-01416-CRB
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONDITIONAL STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
2
Having reviewed the Parties’ Conditional Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice
3
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(2) (the “Stipulation”), and good cause
4
appearing, the District Court shall retain jurisdiction over the above-entitled matter for the
5
purpose of enforcing the settlement agreement between the Parties; and hereby GRANTS the
6
Parties’ Stipulation to dismiss the entire case with prejudice with each party to bear their own fees
7
and costs, including attorneys’ fees.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
May 9, 2018
Date: ___________________
__________________________
Hon. Charles R. Breyer
United States District Judge
11
12
LOS ANGELES
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP
10
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1–
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 14-CV-01416-CRB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?