Objectivity, Inc. v. Exponential Interactive, Inc. et al
Filing
32
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/13/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2015)
1 STUART C. CLARK (SBN 124152)
Email: clark@carrferrell.com
2 CARR & FERRELL LLP
120 Constitution Drive
3 Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone: (650) 812-3400
4 Facsimile: (650) 812-3444
HSIAO C. (MARK) MAO, ESQ. (SBN 236165)
KAUFMAN DOLOWICH & VOLUCK, LLP
Email: mmao@kdvlaw.com
425 California Street, Suite 2100
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 926-7600
Facsimile: (415) 926-7601
5 Attorneys for OBJECTIVITY, INC.
Attorneys for EXPONENTIAL
INTERACTIVE, INC. and JOHN RETTIG
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
OBJECTIVITY, INC., a corporation,
Case No. 3:14-cv-01434-EMC
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14 EXPONENTIAL INTERACTIVE, INC., a
corporation, and JOHN RETTIG, an
15 individual,
16
STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
GRANTING LEAVE TO
AMEND COMPLAINT
Defendants.
17
18
WHEREAS:
19
A.
Plaintiff Objectivity, Inc. (“Objectivity”) seeks leave to amend its complaint to add
20 additional alleged breaches to its breach of contract claim, and to make consequential changes to its
21 copyright claim and to other aspects of the existing complaint, as stated in the [proposed] First
22 Amended Complaint attached hereto as Exhibit “A”;
23
B.
Objectivity alleges that it was not on notice of the additional claims referenced in the
24 [proposed] First Amended Complaint until sometime after this action commenced;
25
C.
Defendants Exponential Interactive, Inc., and John Rettig (“Defendants”) deny and
26 dispute Objectivity’s allegations, but stipulate to the allowance of the [proposed] First Amended
27 Complaint on the basis that: (1) Defendants are not thereby agreeing, conceding, or admitting any
28 of the allegations made in the [proposed] First Amended Complaint, (2) Defendants reserve any and
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT:
Case No. 3:14-cv-01434-EMC
1
2
3
4
5
all rights to challenge the [proposed] First Amended Complaint, including but not limited to
challenges on the basis of any statutes of limitations, laches, waiver, or contractual defenses.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Objectivity and
Defendants, through their undersigned counsel, that Objectivity may file the [proposed] First
Amended Complaint attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.
6
7 Dated: January 9, 2015
8
9
By: /s/ Stuart C. Clark
Stuart C. Clark, Esq.
CARR & FERRELL LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff Objectivity, Inc.
10
11
Dated: January 9, 2015
12
13
By: /s/ Hsiao C. (Mark) Mao
Hsiao C. (Mark) Mao, Esq.
KAUFMAN DOLOWICH & VOLUCK, LLP
Attorneys for Defendants Exponential
Interactive, Inc. and John Rettig
14
15 IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiff to file the first amended complaint
as a separate document.
16
24
ER
R NIA
FO
dwa
Judge E
H
23
RT
22
hen
rd M. C
NO
21
O
IT IS S
DIFIED
AS MO
LI
20
HON. EDWARD M. CHEN
E
UNITED STATES DISTRICT D
ORDER JUDGE
A
19
UNIT
ED
18
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
17 Dated: January 13, 2015
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT:
Case No. 3:14-cv-01434-EMC
Exhibit A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?