Stark v. Pfizer et al

Filing 28

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 17 MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by Pfizer, 15 MOTION to Remand filed by Patricia Stark. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 2, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PATRICIA STARK, Case No. 14-cv-01488-JST Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 PFIZER, et al., ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Pfizer's motion to stay and Plaintiff’s motion to remand. 14 ECF No. 17. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the 15 Court finds that the parties’ briefs have thoroughly addressed the issues, rendering the matter 16 suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for 17 June 12, 2014, is hereby VACATED. 18 However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 19 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 20 been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 21 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 22 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the 23 party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the 24 Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 2, 2014 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?