Melvin Wishum et al v. State of California et al
Filing
17
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 13 MOTION to Dismiss DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT filed by State of California, California Correctional Health Care Services, Corrections and Rehabilitation CDCR, James D. Hartley, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., P D Brazelton. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 30, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MELVIN WISHUM, et al.,
Case No. 14-cv-01491-JST
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER VACATING MOTION
HEARING
Re: ECF No. 13
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss. ECF No. 13. Pursuant to Federal Rule
13
of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the parties’ briefs have
14
thoroughly addressed the issues, rendering the matter suitable for disposition without oral
15
argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for June 5, 2014, is hereby
16
VACATED.
17
However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date
18
of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has
19
been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented
20
argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient
21
to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the
22
party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the
23
Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 30, 2014
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?