Melvin Wishum et al v. State of California et al

Filing 44

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 43 Stipulation filed by Matthew Cate. Case Management Statement due by 3/11/2015. Further Case Management Conference set for 3/25/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 16, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California JOHN P. DEVINE Supervising Deputy Attorney General GRAYSON W. (TREY) MARSHALL, III Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 280409 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-1604 Fax: (415) 703-5480 E-mail: Grayson.Marshall@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendant Matthew Cate 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 MELVIN WISHUM and CHRYSTAL TYLER, 14 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING Plaintiffs, STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 15 v. 16 17 18 No. C 14-cv-01491 JST EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., et al., Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [Proposed] Order Granting Administrative Motion to Continue CMC (No. C 14-cv-01491 JST) 1 2 3 The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulated Motion for Administrative Relief, Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 16-2(d), for Continuance of Case Management Conference, hereby orders as follows: 4 5 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Case Management Conference currently set for January 28, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. is continued until March 25, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. 7 8 Dated: January 16, 2015 ____________________________ Honorable Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [Proposed] Order Granting Administrative Motion to Continue CMC (No. C 14-cv-01491 JST)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?