Melvin Wishum et al v. State of California et al
Filing
58
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - Case Management Conference continued to 7/7/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco.Case Management Statement due by 6/30/2015. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/04/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
JOHN P. DEVINE
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
GRAYSON W. (TREY) MARSHALL, III
Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 280409
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: (415) 703-1604
Fax: (415) 703-5480
E-mail: Grayson.Marshall@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendant Matthew Cate
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
MELVIN WISHUM and CHRYSTAL
TYLER,
No. C 14-cv-01491 WHO
ORDER GRANTING
Plaintiffs, STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
v.
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., et al.,
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Order Granting Administrative Motion to Continue CMC (No. C 14-cv-01491 WHO)
1
The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulated Motion for Administrative Relief,
2
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 16-2(d), for Continuance of Case Management Conference,
3
hereby orders as follows:
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Case Management
5
Conference currently set for May 5, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. is continued until ____________________,
July 7
6
2015, at _____________________.
2:00 p.m.
7
May 4, 2015
Dated: _______________________
____________________________
Honorable William H. Orrick
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Order Granting Administrative Motion to Continue CMC (No. C 14-cv-01491 WHO)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?