Melvin Wishum et al v. State of California et al

Filing 58

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - Case Management Conference continued to 7/7/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco.Case Management Statement due by 6/30/2015. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/04/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California JOHN P. DEVINE Supervising Deputy Attorney General GRAYSON W. (TREY) MARSHALL, III Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 280409 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-1604 Fax: (415) 703-5480 E-mail: Grayson.Marshall@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendant Matthew Cate 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 MELVIN WISHUM and CHRYSTAL TYLER, No. C 14-cv-01491 WHO ORDER GRANTING Plaintiffs, STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., et al., Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Order Granting Administrative Motion to Continue CMC (No. C 14-cv-01491 WHO) 1 The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulated Motion for Administrative Relief, 2 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 16-2(d), for Continuance of Case Management Conference, 3 hereby orders as follows: 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Case Management 5 Conference currently set for May 5, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. is continued until ____________________, July 7 6 2015, at _____________________. 2:00 p.m. 7 May 4, 2015 Dated: _______________________ ____________________________ Honorable William H. Orrick United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Order Granting Administrative Motion to Continue CMC (No. C 14-cv-01491 WHO)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?