OpenTV Inc. v. Netflix Inc.

Filing 79

AMENDED STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/11/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Russell E. Levine, P.C. (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Paul D. Collier (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
James B. Medek (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Greg Polins (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
George William Foster (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
300 North LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL 60654
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

DURIE TANGRI LLP
DARALYN J. DURIE (SBN 169825)
[e-mail]
CLEMENT S. ROBERTS (SBN 209203)
[e-mail]
LAURA E. MILLER (SBN 271713)
[e-mail]
ZAC A. COX (SBN 283535)
[e-mail]
217 Leidesdorff Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
NETFLIX, INC.

John R. Edwards (S.B.N. 244310)
[e-mail]
Brian W. Lee (S.B.N. 255363)
[e-mail]
Mark D. Fahey (S.B.N. 294551)
[e-mail]
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
3330 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs OpenTV, Inc. and
Nagra France SAS

16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
OPENTV, INC.,
19

Plaintiff,
20

v.

21

NETFLIX, INC.,

22

Case No. 3:14-cv-01525-RS
Case No. 3:14-cv-01723-RS
Defendant.

23
24

OPENTV, INC. and NAGRA FRANCE
SAS,

25

AMENDED STIPULATION AND JOINT
MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Judge: Hon. Richard Seeborg

Plaintiffs,
v.

26
NETFLIX, INC.,
27
Defendant.
28
AMENDED STIPULATED AND JOINT MOTION
TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

3:14-cv-01525
3:14-cv-01723

1
2
3
4
5

Plaintiffs OpenTV, Inc. and Nagra France SAS (collectively “OpenTV”) and Defendant Netflix,
Inc. (“Netflix”) hereby stipulate and request that the Court order as follows:
1.

All claims between OpenTV and Netflix, including all claims presented by OpenTV’s

Complaints and all of Netflix’s Counterclaims, shall be dismissed without prejudice; and
2.

OpenTV and Netflix each shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

6
Dated: February 11, 2015

/s/ John R. Edwards

7
Counsel for Plaintiffs

8
9
10

Dated: February 11, 2015

/s/ Laura E. Miller
Counsel for Defendant

11
12
13
14

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 2/11/2015
Richard Seeborg

15

United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AMENDED STIPULATED AND JOINT MOTION
TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

2

3:14-cv-01525
3:14-cv-01723