Almendares v. Macy's West Stores, Inc.

Filing 31

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/1/2014. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2014)

Download PDF
Case3:14-cv-01535-LB Document30 Filed09/29/14 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 STEVEN J. WASSERMAN Attorney At Law California Bar No. 73073 55 Shaver Street, Suite 240 San Rafael, CA 94901 Telephone (415) 457-4777 Facsimile (415) 457-4690 5 6 Attorney for Plaintiff Margarita Almendares 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 14 15 VS. 16 Defendants. 17 18 ES D AT T ICT C TED GRAN RT U O MACY'S WEST STORES, INC. et . al., STIPULATION TO AMEND CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY) ISTR R NIA Plaintiff, 13 Case No.: 3:14-CV-1535-LB S MARGARITA ALMENDARES, UNIT ED 12 AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION 21 C R filed July 25, 2014 the CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRE-TRIAL ORDER (JURY) N F 22 be amended as follows: LI RT FO NO 20 r el Beele ge Laur Jud IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the parties hereto that 19 23 24 A H E D IS T IC T O R 1. Paragraph III. DISCOVERY PROCEDURE B. shall be deleted and the following put in its place: 25 "B. Each side shall be limited to ten depositions and fifty 26 (50) interrogatories (excluding California State Judicial Council 27 Form Interrogatories), as per agreement among the 28 STIPULATION TO AMEND CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY) 3:14-CV-1535-LB 1 Case3:14-cv-01535-LB Document30 Filed09/29/14 Page2 of 2 1 parties hereto, subject to further Court Order." 2 4 DATED: STEVEN J. WASSERMAN Attorney for Plaintiff 5 6 7 8 9 DATED: (;)// //t) .,(419.04i2 A44',Oeuvid47 MATATHEW NOEL Attorney for Defendant/ Cross-Complainant Macy's West Stores, Inc. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 DATED: CHAD D. GREESON Attorney for Defendant/ Cross-Defendant Schindler Elevator Corporation 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO AMEND CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY) 3:14-CV-1535-LB 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?