Abed v. Etihad Airways
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The plaintiff has not filed a timely opposition or response to the order to show cause. Accordingly, the action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/22/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No. 14-cv-01538-WHO
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
On April 8, 2014, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, but the plaintiff
did not file any opposition within the time to do so. On May 8, 2014, I issued an order to show
cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. I required the plaintiff to
respond to the order by May 21, 2014; in lieu of a response, the plaintiff could file an opposition
to the motion to dismiss by the same date.
The plaintiff has not filed a timely opposition or response to the order to show cause.
Accordingly, I ORDER that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
The Clerk is directed to close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 22, 2014
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?