Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems, Inc. v. CardioCom, LLC et al

Filing 147

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR, STIPULATION AND ORDER re 146 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems, Inc. filed by Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/22/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2014)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Clear Form

Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems, Inc.

CASE NO. 3:14-cv-01575-EMC
Plaintiff(s),
v.
CardioCom, LLC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
The parties will confer and decide upon an appropriate mediator from either JAMS or AAA.

_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9

October 31, 2014
other requested deadline _____________________________________________

July 10, 2014
Dated:___________

/s/ Bas de Blank
____________________________
Attorney for Plaintiff

July 14, 2014
Dated:____________

/s/ William Schultz
____________________________
Attorney for Defendant

[PROPOSED] ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT

___________________________________

H

ER

A

7/22/14
Dated:________________

n

M. Che

LI

NO

dward
Judge E

R NIA

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

FO

UNIT
ED

RIC
TC

SD
TE
TA

RT
U
O

Deadline for ADR session
9
90 days from the date of this order.
October 31, 2014
9
other ___________________

S

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
9
Non-binding Arbitration
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
9
Mediation
9
Private ADR
IST

N
UNITED STATES DISTRICT F
O
D

IS T RIC T

C

JUDGE