Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems, Inc. v. CardioCom, LLC et al

Filing 167

ORDER resetting Further Case Management Conference from 7/28/2016 to 10/20/2016 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 10/13/2016.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/27/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ADAM R. ALPER (S.B.N. 196834) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 555 California Street San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 439-1400 Facsimile: (415) 439-1500 aalper@kirkland.com TIMOTHY G. MAJORS (S.B.N. 228275) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 333 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 680-8400 Facsimile: (213) 680-8500 tim.majors@kirkland.com BAS DE BLANK (S.B.N. 191487) basdeblank@orrick.com LILLIAN MAO (S.B.N. 267410) lmao@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 100 Marsh Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 614-7400 Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT BOSCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC. DANIEL W. MCDONALD (Pro Hac Vice) dmcdonald@merchantgould.com WILLIAM D. SCHULTZ (Pro Hac Vice) wschultz@merchantgould.com ERIC CHAD (Pro Hac Vice) echad@merchantgould.com MERCHANT & GOULD P.C. 3200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-2215 Telephone: (612) 332-5300 Facsimile: (612) 332-9081 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant CARDIOCOM, LLC 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 21 ROBERT BOSCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, 22 23 24 25 v. CARDIOCOM, LLC, Defendant. Case No. 3:14-cv-01575-EMC JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Date: Time: Dept: Judge: January 14, 2016 9:30 A.M. 5 Edward M. Chen 26 27 28 JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT & [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:14-CV-01575-EMC 1 Pursuant the Court’s June 29, 2015 Order (Dkt. No. 159) and April 5, 2016 Order (Dkt. 2 No. 165), Plaintiff Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems, Inc. (“Bosch”) and Defendant Cardiocom, 3 LLC (“Cardiocom”) hereby supplement their previous joint case management statements (Dkt. 4 Nos. 140, 150, 152, 158, 160) with the current status of the post-grant review proceedings 5 relevant to the Patents-in-Suit: 6 7 8 IPR / Reexam Case No. IPR2013-00468 & IPR2013-00469 (merged) 9 10 90/013,269 11 12 13 IPR2013-00449 14 15 16 90/013,270 17 IPR2013-00431 18 19 20 90/013,263 21 22 23 24 IPR2013-00451 25 26 27 28 OHSUSA:765482965.4 Patent Claims No. Challenged 7,516,192 1-37 (all claims) Status Final decision issued Jan. 27, 2015. All challenged claims cancelled. Bosch appealed and the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s decision in Rule 36 Judgment on June 29, 2016. 7,516,192 1-10, 13-19, Office Action rejecting challenged 37 claims mailed May 19, 2015. Bosch filed Notice of Appeal on July 2, 2015. Bosch filed Reply Brief and Request for Oral Hearing on December 21, 2015. Bosch waived Oral Hearing on July 8, 2016. 7,840,420 1-5 (all claims) Final decision issued Jan. 15, 2015. All challenged claims cancelled. Bosch appealed and the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s decision in Rule 36 Judgment on June 29, 2016. 7,840,420 1-5 (all claims) All claims confirmed on June 5, 2015. Reexamination certificate issued on July 22, 2015. 7,921,186 1-16 (all Final decision issued Jan. 15, 2015. claims) All challenged claims cancelled. Bosch appealed and the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s decision in Rule 36 Judgment on June 29, 2016. 7,921,186 1-8 Final Office Action rejecting challenged claims mailed April 15, 2015. Bosch filed Notice of Appeal on Sept. 15, 2015 and Appeal Brief on Nov. 16, 2015. Examiner filed Answer to Appeal Brief on December 1, 2015. Bosch waived Oral Hearing on July 8, 2016. 7,587,469 1, 2, 5-10 Final decision issued Jan. 15, 2015. All challenged claims cancelled. Bosch filed Notice of Appeal on Mar. 18, 2015. Bosch filed motion to terminate appeal. The Federal Circuit granted the motion to dismiss appeal on July 24, 2015. 1 JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT & [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 14-CV-01575 EMC 1 2 IPR / Reexam Case No. 90/013,175 3 4 90/013,663 5 6 IPR2014-00488 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 90/013,167 24 25 90/013,484 26 27 28 OHSUSA:765482965.4 Patent Claims No. Challenged 7,587,469 1-22 (all claims) Status Reexamination certificate issued on December 8, 2015, confirming claims 3 and 4, and canceling claims 1, 2, and 5-22. 7,587,469 3 Reexamination request filed on Dec. 21, 2015, pending decision by Office. The USPTO mailed a non-final Office Action rejecting claim 3 on May 18, 2016. 7,769,605 1-9 (all claims) IPR Instituted on all claims Sept. 2014. Terminated on Bosch’s Motion to Terminate for Petitioner’s Failure to Name all Real Parties in Interest on March 16, 2015. Request for Rehearing denied May 22, 2015. Medtronic filed Notice of Appeal on July 23, 2015. Federal Circuit granted Bosch’s motion to dismiss appeal on Nov. 17, 2015. Medtronic filed petition for en banc rehearing on Dec. 17, 2015. Federal Circuit sua sponte recalled its dismissal mandate on June 30, 2016. Federal Circuit ordered additional briefing on July 1, 2016. Medtronic also filed suit against Michelle K. Lee, Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office in the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Medtronic sought an order requiring the PTO to reinstitute the terminated IPR. The District Court for the E.D. Virginia dismissed case. Medtronic appealed the dismissal to the Federal Circuit requesting initial en banc review. Briefing suspended by the Federal Circuit Feb. 22. 2016. 7,769,605 1-9 (all claims) All claims confirmed on June 2, 2015. Reexamination certificate issued on June 22, 2015. 7,769,605 1-9 (all claims) Reexamination ordered on all claims June 9, 2015. First office action issued on Sept. 10, 2015, rejecting all claims. Bosch submitted response on 2 JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT & [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 14-CV-01575 EMC 1 IPR / Reexam Case No. 2 3 4 90/013,527 5 6 7 8 9 90/013,769 90/013,773 10 11 12 IPR2014-00607 (merged with 201400691) 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Patent No. Claims Challenged Status Nov. 10, 2015. All claims confirmed on March 14, 2016. Reexamination certificate issued on March 30, 2016. 7,769,605 1-9 (all claims) Petition filed June 12, 2015. Reexamination denied on Aug. 12, 2015. Petition for review of reexamination denial filed on Sept. 14, 2015. The USPTO denied review of denial on January 15, 2016 and no claim was cancelled. 7,769,605 1-9 (all claims) Petition filed June 17, 2016. Awaiting USPTO decision on whether to institute reexamination. 7,769,605 1-9 (all claims) Petition filed June 29, 2016. Reexamination ordered for all claims on July 19, 2016. 7,870,249 1, 2, 6-8, 11Terminated on Bosch’s Motion to 13 Terminate for Petitioner’s Failure to Name all Real Parties in Interest on March 16, 2015. Request for Rehearing denied May 22, 2015. Medtronic filed Notice of Appeal on July 23, 2015. Federal Circuit granted Bosch’s motion to dismiss appeal on Nov. 17, 2015. Medtronic filed petition for en banc rehearing on Dec. 17, 2015. Federal Circuit sua sponte recalled its dismissal mandate on June 30, 2016. Federal Circuit ordered additional briefing on July 1, 2016. Medtronic also filed suit against Michelle K. Lee, Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office in the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Medtronic sought an order requiring the PTO to reinstitute the terminated IPR. The District Court for the E.D. Virginia dismissed case. Medtronic appealed the dismissal to the Federal Circuit requesting initial en banc review. Federal Circuit suspended briefing on Feb. 22, 2016. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OHSUSA:765482965.4 3 JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT & [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 14-CV-01575 EMC 2 IPR / Reexam Case No. IPR2014-00691 Patent Claims No. Challenged 7,870,249 3-5, 9, 10, 1429 90/013,262 7,870,249 14-18, 20-21, 23-26 90/013,493 7,870,249 1, 2, 6-8, 1013 90/013,647 1 7,870,249 1-13 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OHSUSA:765482965.4 4 Status Terminated on Bosch’s Motion to Terminate for Petitioner’s Failure to Name all Real Parties in Interest on March 16, 2015. Request for Rehearing denied May 22, 2015. Medtronic filed Notice of Appeal on July 23, 2015. Federal Circuit granted Bosch’s motion to dismiss appeal on Nov. 17, 2015. Medtronic filed petition for en banc rehearing on Dec. 17, 2015. Federal Circuit sua sponte recalled its dismissal mandate on June 30, 2016. Federal Circuit ordered additional briefing on July 1, 2016. Medtronic also filed suit against Michelle K. Lee, Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office in the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Medtronic sought an order requiring the PTO to reinstitute the terminated IPR. The District Court for the E.D. Virginia dismissed case. Medtronic appealed the dismissal to the Federal Circuit requesting initial en banc review. Federal Circuit suspended briefing on Feb. 22, 2016. Reexamination certificate confirming claims 14-18, 20-21 and cancelling claims 23-26, issued May 22, 2015. Reexamination ordered for claims 1, 2, 6-8, and 10-13 on June 3, 2015. First office action issued on Aug. 20, 2015, rejecting challenged claims. Bosch filed response and terminal disclaimer on Oct. 20, 2015. Terminal disclaimer approved on Oct. 21, 2015. Non-final rejection mailed February 25, 2016. Bosch filed response on May 25, 2016. Proceeding merged with 90/013,647 on July 8, 2016. Reexamination ordered for claims 113 on January 20, 2016. Non-final rejection mailed April 7, 2016. Bosch filed response on June 21, 2016. Proceeding merged with 90/013,493 on July 8, 2016. JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT & [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 14-CV-01575 EMC 1 2 IPR / Reexam Case No. 90/013,638 Patent Claims No. Challenged 7,870,249 1-2, 6-8, 11-13 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Status Reexamination request filed on Nov. 23, 2015. Request denied on Dec. 17, 2015. Reexamination terminated on February 18, 2016 and no claims were cancelled. Bosch may seek rehearing, en banc review, or certiorari of the Federal Circuit’s decisions with respect to the ‘192, ‘186, and ‘420 Patents. Therefore, the parties respectfully request that the Court take the Case Management Conference off the calendar and allow the parties to file a supplemental status report on October 11, 2016 informing the Court whether Bosch has appealed or sought review of the Federal Circuit’s decision. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OHSUSA:765482965.4 5 JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT & [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 14-CV-01575 EMC 1 Dated: July 21, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 2 By: /s/ Bas de Blank Bas de Blank, Bar No. 191487 bdeblank@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 614-7400 Facsimile: (650) 614-7401 3 4 5 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT BOSCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC. 8 9 Dated: July 21, 2016 By: /s/ William D. Schultz w/ permission Bas de Blank William D. Schultz wschultz@merchantgould.com MERCHANT & GOULD P.C. 3200 ids Center 80 S. Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-2215 Telephone: (612) 336-4637 Facsimile: (612) 332-9081 10 11 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Defendant CARDIOCOM, LLC 16 17 RT ER H 24 dw Judge E 25 ard M. R NIA NO 23 ERED O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO Chen FO UNIT ED 22 RT U O 21 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T LI 20 A 19 IT IS SO ORDERED that the Further CMC is reset for 10/20/16 at 10:30 a.m. An updated joint CMC Statement shall be filed by 10/13/16. S 18 N F D IS T IC T O R C 26 27 28 OHSUSA:765482965.4 6 JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT & [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 14-CV-01575 EMC CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 1 2 3 4 The above JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER is approved as the Case Management Order for this case and all parties shall comply with its provisions. [In addition, the Court makes the further orders stated below:] 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 8 JUDGE EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OHSUSA:765482965.4 7 JOINT SUPPLEMENTAL CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT & [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 14-CV-01575 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?