Coleman v. American International Group, Inc. Group Benefit Plan et al
Filing
44
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 42 Stipulation re: Pagination of Defendants' Responsive Brief in Support of Motion for Judgment Under F.R.C.P. 52.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
KATHEE A. COLEMAN,
Case No. C 14-01584 VC (DMR)
(PROPOSED) ORDER ON JOINT
STIPULATION RE: PAGINATION
OF DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSIVE
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
FOR JUDGMENT UNDER F.R.C.P.
52
Plaintiff,
v.
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL
GROUP, INC. GROUP BENEFIT
PLAN, and HARTFORD LIFE AND
ACCIDENT INSURANCE
COMPANY,
[Local Rule 7-11]
ERISA Cross-Motion Hearing
DATE: February 19, 2015
TIME: 10:00 a.m.
CTRM: 4
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LA #4832-7950-5954 v2
-1-
CASE NO. C 14-01584 VC (DMR)
(PROPOSED) ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION
RE: PAGINATION OF RESPONSIVE BRIEF
1
ORDER
2
3
Having considered the parties’ joint stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that
4
Defendants’ 24-page Responsive Brief filed on February 5, 2015 (Docket No. 41)
5
will remain filed with this Court and will be considered in support of Defendants’
6
Motion for Judgment under FRCP Rule 52.
7
8
[ALTERNTIVELY, Having considered the parties’ joint stipulation, and
9
Defendants’ proposed 15-page alternate Responsive Brief lodged concurrently
10
therewith, it is hereby ORDERED Defendants’ alternate Responsive Brief which
11
does not exceed 15 pages, is hereby accepted in lieu of the Responsive Brief filed
12
on February 5, 2015 (Docket No. 41).]
13
14
15
February 18, 2015
DATED: ____________
16
_________________________________
HON. VINCE CHHABRIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LA #4832-7950-5954 v2
-2-
CASE NO. C 14-01584 VC (DMR)
(PROPOSED) ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION
RE: PAGINATION OF RESPONSIVE BRIEF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?