Coleman v. American International Group, Inc. Group Benefit Plan et al

Filing 44

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 42 Stipulation re: Pagination of Defendants' Responsive Brief in Support of Motion for Judgment Under F.R.C.P. 52.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 KATHEE A. COLEMAN, Case No. C 14-01584 VC (DMR) (PROPOSED) ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION RE: PAGINATION OF DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSIVE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENT UNDER F.R.C.P. 52 Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. GROUP BENEFIT PLAN, and HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, [Local Rule 7-11] ERISA Cross-Motion Hearing DATE: February 19, 2015 TIME: 10:00 a.m. CTRM: 4 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LA #4832-7950-5954 v2 -1- CASE NO. C 14-01584 VC (DMR) (PROPOSED) ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION RE: PAGINATION OF RESPONSIVE BRIEF 1 ORDER 2 3 Having considered the parties’ joint stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that 4 Defendants’ 24-page Responsive Brief filed on February 5, 2015 (Docket No. 41) 5 will remain filed with this Court and will be considered in support of Defendants’ 6 Motion for Judgment under FRCP Rule 52. 7 8 [ALTERNTIVELY, Having considered the parties’ joint stipulation, and 9 Defendants’ proposed 15-page alternate Responsive Brief lodged concurrently 10 therewith, it is hereby ORDERED Defendants’ alternate Responsive Brief which 11 does not exceed 15 pages, is hereby accepted in lieu of the Responsive Brief filed 12 on February 5, 2015 (Docket No. 41).] 13 14 15 February 18, 2015 DATED: ____________ 16 _________________________________ HON. VINCE CHHABRIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LA #4832-7950-5954 v2 -2- CASE NO. C 14-01584 VC (DMR) (PROPOSED) ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION RE: PAGINATION OF RESPONSIVE BRIEF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?