Courtade v. Pappalardo

Filing 30

ORDER regarding redactions and amended complaint. Redacted version of Defendant's motion to dismiss due January 9, 2015. Plaintiff's amended complaint remains due January 9, 2015. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on December 20, 2014. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

SANDRINE COURTADE,

Case No. 14-cv-01594-JCS

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER REGARDING REDACTIONS
AND AMENDED COMPLAINT

9
10

ALBERT P. PAPPALARDO,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 25, 26

Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

On November 6, 2014, the Court entered an Order (dkt. 22) sealing certain documents filed

13

in this case that contained information protected by Rule 5.2(a) if the Federal Rules of Civil

14

Procedure, and requiring the parties to file redacted versions in the public record. On November

15

14, 2014, the Court entered an Order (dkt. 24) dismissing Plaintiff Sandrine Courtade’s Complaint

16

with leave to file an amended complaint.

17

Plaintiff filed documents styled as an “Amended Complaint” (dkt. 25) and an “Amended

18

Supplemental Declaration of Sandrine Courtade” (dkt. 26) on November 14, 2014. These

19

documents are identical to Plaintiff’s now-sealed earlier filings (dkts. 1, 6), except that Plaintiff

20

has redacted protected information identified in the November 6 Order. The Court therefore

21

construes these filings as a response to that Order, but does not construe the so-called “Amended

22

Complaint” as a response to the Court’s November 14 Order dismissing her initial Complaint.

23

Plaintiff is therefore reminded that if wishes to pursue this action, she must file an amended

24

complaint addressing the deficiencies identified in the November 14 Order no later than

25

January 9, 2015. If Plaintiff fails to do so, this action will be dismissed with prejudice.

26

Defendant Albert Pappalardo has not yet filed a redacted version of his Motion to Dismiss

27

(dkt. 14). Although that Motion has since been granted, Defendant must nevertheless file a

28

redacted version to complete the public record of this action. Defendant must comply with the

1

November 6 Order by filing a redacted version of his Motion to Dismiss no later than

2

January 9, 2015. If Defendant fails to do so, the Court will impose an appropriate sanction.

3

The Clerk is instructed to include copies of the November 6 and November 14 Orders

4

when serving this Order on the parties. Both parties are reminded to comply with the

5

confidentiality requirements of Rule 5.2(a) if this action continues.

6
7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 20, 2014.
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate Judge

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2