Adkins et al v. Apple Inc et al

Filing 141

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES - Defendants shall file a responsive brief of no more than five pages, double spaced by noon March 17, 2015, to plaintiffs' 140 Supplemental Brief. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/10/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

FABRIENNE ENGLISH, et al.,

Case No. 14-cv-01619-WHO

Plaintiffs,
8

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS'
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF REGARDING
DISCOVERY DISPUTES

v.
9
10

APPLE INC, et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 140

Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

On March 2, 2015, I issued an order instructing plaintiffs to file a supplemental brief

13

regarding the parties’ dispute over a number of plaintiffs’ requests for production. Dkt. No. 138.

14

Having reviewed plaintiffs’ supplemental brief, Dkt. No. 140, I find that it warrants a response.

15

No later than noon on March 17, 2015, defendants shall file a responsive brief of no more than

16

five pages, double spaced. Plaintiffs shall not reply. After reviewing defendants’ responsive brief,

17

I will determine whether a hearing is required.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 10, 2015
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge