OpenTV, Inc. et al v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 182

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 179 Stipulation to Modify Briefing Schedule re 175 MOTION to Strike, 176 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 GEORGE A. RILEY (S.B. #118304) griley@omm.com LUANN L. SIMMONS (S.B. #203526) lsimmons@omm.com MELODY DRUMMOND HANSEN (S.B. #278786) mdrummondhansen@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3823 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 5 6 7 8 9 RYAN K. YAGURA (S.B. #197619) ryagura@omm.com XIN-YI ZHOU (S.B. #251969) vzhou@omm.com BRIAN M. COOK (S.B. #266181) bcook@omm.com KEVIN MURRAY (S.B. #275186) kmurray2@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 400 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071-2899 Telephone: (213) 430-6000 Facsimile: (213) 430-6407 10 11 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 OPENTV, INC. AND NAGRAVISION S.A., 17 18 19 20 21 Case No. 3:14-cv-01622-HSG Plaintiffs, JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Defendant. Case Filed: April 9, 2014 Judge: Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. v. APPLE INC., 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE 3:14-CV-01622-HSG 1 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiffs OpenTV, Inc., and Nagravision S.A. 2 (“OpenTV”) and Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) hereby stipulate to extend the briefing schedule 3 for OpenTV’s Motion to Strike Apple’s Infringement Contentions and Motion for Judgment on 4 the Pleadings. 5 WHEREAS on July 2, 2015, OpenTV filed a Motion to Strike Apple’s Infringement 6 Contentions (Dkt. 175) and a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. 176), both noticed for 7 hearing on August 27, 2015; 8 WHEREAS by rule, Apple’s oppositions to both motions are due July 16, 2015; 9 WHEREAS by rule, OpenTV’s replies in support of both motions are due July 23, 2105; 10 WHEREAS because the motions were filed the night before the July 4th holiday weekend 11 and several counsel for OpenTV and for Apple are on or have scheduled vacations during July, 12 the Parties met and conferred and agreed to jointly request a one-week extension for Apple’s 13 opposition briefs and three-court-day extension for OpenTV’s reply briefs; 14 WHEREAS under the Parties’ requested briefing schedule, OpenTV’s motions will be 15 fully briefed and before the Court twenty-three days before the noticed hearing date of August 27, 16 2015; and 17 WHEREAS the Parties have not previously requested any modifications to the briefing 18 schedule set by rule for these motions, and the modification requested herein will not affect the 19 noticed hearing date for these motions or any other scheduled dates or events in this action. 20 21 22 23 24 25 It is hereby STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the Parties, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows: (1) Apple’s oppositions to OpenTV’s Motion to Strike and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings will both be due no later than July 23, 2015, and (2) OpenTV’s replies in support of its Motion to Strike and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings will both be due no later than August 4, 2015. 26 27 28 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2(a), this stipulation is supported by the concurrently filed Declaration of Luann L. Simmons. -2- JOINT STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE 3:14-CV-01622-HSG 1 2 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 3 Dated: July 7, 2015 4 O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP /s/ Luann L. Simmons George A. Riley (S.B. #118304) griley@omm.com Luann L. Simmons (S.B. #203526) lsimmons@omm.com Melody Drummond Hansen (S.B. #278786) mdrummondhansen@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3823 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 /s/ Robert F. McCauley Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056) robert.mccauley@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304-1203 Telephone: (650) 849-6600 Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Ryan K. Yagura (S.B. #197619) ryagura@omm.com Xin-Yi Zhou (S.B. #251969) vzhou@omm.com Kevin Murray (S.B. #275186) kmurray2@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 400 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90071-2899 Telephone: (213) 430-6000 Facsimile: (213) 430-6407 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE INC. Gerald F. Ivey (pro hac vice) Smith R. Brittingham IV (pro hac vice) Elizabeth A. Niemeyer (pro hac vice) John M. Williamson (pro hac vice) Aliza A. George (pro hac vice) Cecilia Sanabria (pro hac vice) Robert D. Wells (SBN 277903) FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 901 New York Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001-4413 Telephone: (202) 408-4000 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 Stephen E. Kabakoff (pro hac vice) FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 3500 SunTrust Plaza 303 Peachtree Street, N.E. Atlanta, GA 30308-3263 Telephone: (404) 653- 6400 Facsimile: (404) 653-6444 Attorneys for Plaintiffs OPENTV, INC. AND NAGRAVISION S.A. 27 28 -3- JOINT STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE 3:14-CV-01622-HSG 1 ATTESTATION 2 In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Robert F. McCauley , counsel 3 for Plaintiffs, has concurred in the filing of this Joint Stipulation Regarding Briefing Schedule for 4 Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. 5 6 7 By: /s/ Luann L. Simmons 8 Luann L. Simmons 9 10 11 ORDER 12 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court sets the deadline for Apple to file its 13 opposition to OpenTV’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on July 23, 2015, and the 14 deadline for OpenTV to file its reply in support of its Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on 15 August 4, 2015. 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 19 Dated: July 9, 2015 Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- JOINT STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE 3:14-CV-01622-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?