OpenTV, Inc. et al v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
215
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 214 Joint Stipulation Requesting Permission to Connect Laptops for Visual Presentations at Hearing Thursday, September 24, 2015 (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
Robert F. McCauley ( SBN 162056)
robert.mccauley@finnegan.com
Jacob A. Schroeder (SBN 264717)
jacob.schroeder@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1203
Telephone:
(650) 849-6600
Facsimile:
(650) 849-6666
George A. Riley (S.B. #118304)
griley@omm.com
Luann L. Simmons (S.B. #203526)
lsimmons@omm.com
Melody Drummond Hansen (S.B. #278786)
mdrummondhansen@omm.com
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3823
Telephone: (415) 984-8700
Facsimile: (415) 984-8701
Gerald F. Ivey (pro hac vice)
Smith R. Brittingham IV (pro hac vice)
Elizabeth A. Niemeyer (pro hac vice)
John M. Williamson (pro hac vice)
Aliza A. George (pro hac vice)
Robert D. Wells (SBN 277903)
Cecilia Sanabria (pro hac vice)
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
901 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001-4413
Telephone:
(202) 408-4000
Facsimile:
(202) 408-4400
Ryan K. Yagura (S.B. #197619)
ryagura@omm.com
Xin-Yi Zhou (S.B. #251969)
vzhou@omm.com
Kevin Murray (S.B. #275186)
kmurray2@omm.com
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
400 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071-2899
Telephone: (213) 430-6000
Facsimile: (213) 430-6407
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Stephen E. Kabakoff (pro hac vice)
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3500 SunTrust Plaza
303 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30308-3263
Telephone:
(404) 653- 6400
Facsimile:
(404) 653-6444
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
OPENTV, INC. and NAGRAVISION S.A.
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO
20
21
22
OpenTV, Inc., and Nagravision S.A.,
Plaintiffs,
23
24
v.
25
Apple Inc.,
26
Case No. 3:14-cv-01622-HSG
JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING
PERMISSION TO CONNECT
LAPTOPS FOR VISUAL
PRESENTATIONS AT HEARING
THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2015
Defendant.
27
28
STIPULATION RE VISUAL PRESENTATIONS
STATEMENT 3:14-CV-01622-HSG
1
Counsel for Plaintiffs OpenTV, Inc. and Nagravision, SA, (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant
2
Apple Inc. (“Apple”) stipulate and respectfully request an order permitting counsel and/or their
3
staff to bring laptop computers into the courthouse and connect their respective laptops into
4
Courtroom 15’s visual presentation system on Thursday, September 24, 2015, for the Case
5
Management Conference and hearing on Apple’s Motion to Stay Pending Completion of IPR
6
Proceedings (Dkt. Nos. 194, 207, 209) on that same date.
7
ATTESTATION
8
9
10
11
I, Luann L. Simmons, hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures
corresponding to any signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed
document.
12
/s/ Luann L. Simmons
13
14
15
Dated: September 22, 2015
16
17
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
By:
/s/ Robert F. McCauley
Robert F. McCauley
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
OPENTV, INC. AND
NAGRAVISION S.A.
18
19
20
21
Dated: September 22, 2015
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
22
23
24
By: /s/ Luann L. Simmons
Luann L. Simmons
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.
25
26
27
28
1
UPDATED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT
STATEMENT 3:14-CV-01622-HSG
1
2
ORDER
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. Counsel for the parties (and/or
3
their staff) may bring laptop computers into the courthouse and connect their respective laptops
4
into Courtroom 15’s visual presentation system on Thursday, September 24, 2015, for the Case
5
Management Conference and hearing on Apple’s Motion to Stay Pending Completion of IPR
6
Proceedings on that same date.
7
8
Dated: September 22, 2015
9
10
11
______________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
UPDATED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT
STATEMENT 3:14-CV-01622-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?