OpenTV, Inc. et al v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 226

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 225 Stipulation Re Dismissal. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2016)

1
2
3
4
5

Robert F. McCauley ( SBN 162056)
[e-mail]
Jacob A. Schroeder (SBN 264717)
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1203
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Gerald F. Ivey (pro hac vice)
Smith R. Brittingham IV (pro hac vice)
Elizabeth A. Niemeyer (pro hac vice)
John M. Williamson (pro hac vice)
Aliza A. George (pro hac vice)
Robert D. Wells (SBN 277903)
Cecilia Sanabria (pro hac vice)
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
901 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001-4413
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

Luann L. Simmons (S.B. #203526)
[e-mail]
Melody Drummond Hansen (S.B. #278786)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3823
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Ryan K. Yagura (S.B. #197619)
[e-mail]
Xin-Yi Zhou (S.B. #251969)
[e-mail]
Kevin Murray (S.B. #275186)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
400 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071-2899
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC.

13
14
15
16
17
18

Stephen E. Kabakoff (pro hac vice)
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3500 SunTrust Plaza
303 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30308-3263
Telephone:
(404) 653- 6400
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
OPENTV, INC. and NAGRAVISION S.A.

19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO

20
21
22

OpenTV, Inc., and Nagravision S.A.,
Plaintiffs,

23
24

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

v.

25

Case No. 3:14-cv-01622-HSG

Apple Inc.,

26

Defendant.

27
28
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
3:14-CV-01622-HSG

1

Plaintiffs OPEN TV, INC. and NAGRAVISION S.A. (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant

2

APPLE INC. (“Defendant”) announced to the Court that they have resolved Plaintiffs’ claims for

3

relief against Defendant asserted in this case and Defendant’s claims, defenses and/or

4

counterclaims for relief against Plaintiffs asserted in this case. Plaintiffs and Defendant have

5

therefore requested that the Court dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims for relief against Defendant with

6

prejudice and Defendant’s claims, defenses and/or counterclaims for relief against Plaintiffs

7

without prejudice, and with all attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses borne by the party incurring

8

same. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that their request for dismissal

9

should be granted.

10

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ claims for relief against Defendant are

11

dismissed with prejudice and Defendant’s claims, defenses and/or counterclaims for relief against

12

Plaintiffs are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees,

13

costs of court and expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same.

14
15
16

Dated: August 4, 2016

By:
United States District Judge
Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
3:14-CV-01622-HSG