OpenTV, Inc. et al v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 37

ORDER NOTING WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING IN PART STIPULATION re 36 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER; 35 ORDER ADVISING PARTIES OF COURT'S TENTATIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 9, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 OPENTV, INC., et al., Case No. 14-cv-01622-JST Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER NOTING WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING IN PART STIPULATION 9 10 APPLE, INC., Defendant. Re: ECF Nos. 35 & 36 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 The court construes the parties’ stipulation, ECF No. 36, as representing to the court that 14 Defendant’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint, ECF No. 35, will soon be mooted by 15 the filing of a second amended complaint. Since the parties have stipulated to the filing of a 16 second amended complaint, amendment is permitted by Rule 15(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 17 Procedure. Accordingly, the court construes Defendant as having WITHDRAWN its motion to 18 dismiss the first amended complaint, ECF No. 35, and so the court VACATES the hearing 19 scheduled for July 10, 2014. At the parties’ request, and pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules 20 of Civil Procedure, the court ORDERS Plaintiffs to file the second amended complaint not later 21 than July 28, 2014. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 9, 2014 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?