OpenTV, Inc. et al v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 59

SCHEDULING ORDER. Tutorial Hearing set for 3/9/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Claims Construction Hearing set for 3/23/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 25, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 OPENTV, INC., et al., Case No. 14-cv-01622-JST Plaintiffs, 9 v. SCHEDULING ORDER 10 11 APPLE, INC., United States District Court Northern District of California Defendant. 12 13 14 15 The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10: 16 17 Event Deadline Initial disclosures August 7, 2014 ESI Stipulation and Stipulated Protective Order September 2, 12014 Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions; Document Production Accompanying Disclosure September 5, 2014 Last Day to Join Parties or Amend Pleadings November 24, 2014 23 Invalidity Contentions; Document Production Accompanying Invalidity Contentions October 20, 2014 24 Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction November 3, 2014 25 November 24, 2014 26 Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence 27 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement December 19, 2014 18 19 20 21 22 28 Event 1 2 Deadline Completion of Claim Construction Discovery (including depositions of experts who submitted declarations in support of claim construction positions) January 30, 2015 Claim Construction Opening Brief February 2, 2015 Claim Construction Responsive Brief February 16, 2015 Claim Construction Reply Brief February 23, 2015 Technology Tutorial March 9, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. Claim Construction Hearing 5 January 16, 2015 Defendant serves Preliminary Election of Asserted Prior Art 4 January 16, 2015 Plaintiffs serve Preliminary Election of Asserted Claims 3 March 23, 2015 at 2:00 p.m. 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 After the court has issued a claim construction order, the parties shall move the court to set a further case management conference for a date within 90 days of the date the claim construction order issues (if such further case management statement has not been set by that time). Ten days before the further case management conference, the parties shall file a joint case management statement, including the parties’ stipulated proposed scheduled, or competing schedules, leading to trial. Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders. The parties shall meet and confer regarding the format, scope, and content of both the tutorial and the claim construction hearing, including but not limited to the permissible subjects of discussion at each, whether experts will testify, and what audio-visual equipment, if any, will be needed by the parties. They also shall exchange copies of any audio-visual material at least ten court days before they intend to use it in court, and shall bring any disputes regarding the format, scope, or content of any tutorial or hearing to the Court’s attention at least five court days before the tutorial or hearing. The Court will deem as waived any objection raised less than five court 28 2 1 days before the tutorial or hearing. The parties shall lodge hard copies of their presentation 2 materials with the Court on the day of the tutorial or claim construction hearing. 3 4 The Court will reserve no more than one and a half hours on its calendar for the tutorial, including a brief recess. The tutorial will not be reported by a court reporter. At claim construction, the Court will construe only the terms the parties identify in their 6 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement as “most significant to the resolution of the 7 case up to a maximum of 10.” Patent Local Rule 4-3(c). The Court will reserve no more than two 8 and a half hours its calendar for the claim construction hearing, including a brief recess. The 9 Court prefers that the parties proceed term-by-term, with each party providing its views on each 10 term before moving on to the next. The Court’s use of time limits means that the parties may not 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 5 have the opportunity to present oral argument on every term they have submitted for construction, 12 and the parties should prioritize their presentations accordingly. 13 The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire 14 counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely 15 manner and appear on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their calendars 16 to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. 17 Dated: July 25, 2014 18 19 _______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?