Moon v. Brown et al
Filing
32
***Deadlines terminated. 31 Received Document filed by Adrian Moon, 30 Received Document filed by Adrian Moon., ORDER (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 12/2/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8 ADRIAN MOON,
No. C 14-1638 SI (pr)
9
ORDER DENYING ADDITIONAL
POST-JUDGMENT MOTIONS
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Plaintiff,
v.
EDMUND G. BROWN, JR.; et al.,
Defendants.
13
/
14
15
This case was dismissed and judgment entered on September 9, 2014. The court denied
16 plaintiff's later-filed motions to vacate the judgment and file an amended complaint. Plaintiff
17 has filed two more post-judgment requests.
18
Plaintiff filed a second "ex parte application for notice and rulings on submitted matters."
19 Docket # 30. The application is DENIED because there is no motion or other matter that has
20 been under submission in this case for more than 120 days. See N.D. Cal. Local Rule 7-13.
21
Plaintiff filed an "ex parte application for motion to the executive committee to re-open
22 case and re-assignment" to Judge Henderson. Docket # 31. The application is DENIED because
23 there is no reason to re-open the case, and there is no reason to reassign a closed case. See
24 Docket # 29 at 1 (rejecting earlier effort described as one in a series of efforts by plaintiff that
25 were "trying to steer his case to Judge Henderson, who had declined to relate this case to the
26 Plata prison conditions class action").
27
28
1
Plaintiff may not file any more motions, applications or requests in this closed case. If
2 he wants to take an appeal, he should file a notice of appeal and then pursue his arguments in
3 the Ninth Circuit.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5 Dated: December 2, 2014
6
7
____________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?