Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Tempur-Sealy International, Inc. et al

Filing 68

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 67 Ex Parte Application (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
GARY T. LAFAYETTE (SBN 088666)
Email: [e-mail]
AFRICA E. DAVIDSON (SBN 225680)
[e-mail]
101 Mission Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
SHIPMAN & GOODWIN LLP
JAMES P. RUGGERI (pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
1875 K Street, N.W., Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

[phone]
[phone]

12

FAX

600
94105
SUITE

CALIFORNIA
FRANCISCO,
SAN

LAW
AT

STREET,

ATTORNEYS

MISSION

101

LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP

11

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16

HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

vs.
TEMPUR-SEALY INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
formerly known as TEMPUR-PEDIC
INTERNATIONAL, INC. and TEMPURPEDIC NORTH AMERICA, LLC,
Defendants.

Case No. 3:14-CV-01661-HSG
APPLICATION AND ORDER TO
ALLOW PLAINTIFF ENTRY INTO
AND USE OF ELECTRONIC
EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTROOM
AT HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
Date: October 8, 2015
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Dept: Courtroom 15
Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Complaint filed: April 10, 2014

24
25

Plaintiff Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”) submits the following

26

Application and Proposed Order to allow Hartford’s counsel, James P. Ruggeri, entry into and

27

use of electronic equipment in the courtroom in connection with the October 8, 2015 hearing on

28

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment in the above captioned matter.
PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF ENTRY INTO
AND USE OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTROOM (Case No. 3:14-CV-01661-HSG)

1

1

Plaintiff hereby applies for leave to bring into the Courtroom and to use the following

2

electronic and audio-visual equipment, all of which Plaintiff contends will aid the Court in

3

reviewing the presentations and evidence submitted at the hearing:

4

1. 1 Projector Screens;

5

2. 1 Optoma Projectors;

6

3. 1 Laptop computers;

7

4. Personal wireless motem (MoFi);

8

5. Projector table;

9

6. Apple TV;

[phone]
[phone]

8. Cart.

12

FAX

600
94105
SUITE

CALIFORNIA
FRANCISCO,
SAN

LAW
AT

STREET,

ATTORNEYS

MISSION

101

7. Associated power cords and cables; and

11
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP

10

The above listed equipment will be brought into the courtroom and operated by Kelvin

13

Su, a Document Specialist employed by counsel for Plaintiff’s office.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Dated: October 6, 2015

LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP
/s/ Gary Lafayette
GARY T. LAFAYETTE
AFRICA E. DAVIDSON
and
JAMES P. RUGGERI
SHIPMAN & GOODWIN LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff HARTFORD FIRE
INSURANCE COMPANY

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF ENTRY INTO
AND USE OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTROOM (Case No. 3:14-CV-01661-HSG)

2

1

ORDER

2

Pursuant to the application of Plaintiff, and good cause appearing therefore, the Plaintiff

3

is granted leave to bring into the Courtroom and to use the following electronic and audio-visual

4

equipment, all of which will aid the Court in reviewing the presentations and evidence submitted

5

at the hearing:

6

1. 1 Projector Screens;

7

2. 1 Optoma Projectors;

8

3. 1 Laptop computers;

9

4. Personal wireless motem (MoFi);

7. Associated power cords and cables; and

13

8. Cart.

14

The above listed equipment will be brought into the courtroom and operated by Kelvin
Su, a Document Specialist employed by counsel for Plaintiff’s office.

16

18
19

S

17

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
D
DENIE

R NIA

15

UNIT
ED

20

24

ER

Jr.

FO

. Gilliam

LI

Jud

ood S
g e H ay w

H

23

RT

22

NO

21

A

[phone]
[phone]

12

FAX

600
94105
SUITE

CALIFORNIA
FRANCISCO,
SAN

LAW
AT

STREET,

ATTORNEYS

MISSION

6. Apple TV;

RT
U
O

101

5. Projector table;

11
LAFAYETTE & KUMAGAI LLP

10

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF ENTRY INTO
AND USE OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT IN THE COURTROOM (Case No. 3:14-CV-01661-HSG)

3