Braden Partners, LP et al v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company

Filing 100

ORDER VACATING HEARING re 90 MOTION for Reconsideration to Alter or Amend Order on Twin City's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59 (e) and 60 (b) filed by Teijin Pharma USA, LLC, Braden Partners, LP. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 18, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2015)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 BRADEN PARTNERS, LP, et al., Case No. 14-cv-01689-JST Plaintiffs, 5 ORDER VACATING HEARING v. 6 7 8 9 TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Re: ECF No. 90 Defendant. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend Order on Twin City’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60(b). ECF 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 No. 90. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court 12 finds the matter suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, 13 currently scheduled for June 25, 2015, is hereby VACATED. 14 If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 15 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 16 been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 17 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 18 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the 19 party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the 20 Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 17, 2015 _____________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?