Braden Partners, LP et al v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Filing
132
SCHEDULING ORDER. Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings 4/8/2016. Fact discovery cut-off 8/12/2016. Expert disclosures 9/2/2016. Expert rebuttal 9/23/2016. Expert discovery cut-off 10/7/2016. Deadline to file dispositive motions 10/28 /2016. Pretrial conference statement due 1/10/2017 Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/20/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 2/13/2017 - 2/27/2017 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 4, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
BRADEN PARTNERS, LP, et al.,
Case No. 14-cv-01689-JST
Plaintiffs,
9
v.
SCHEDULING ORDER
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant.
12
13
14
15
The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10. This order replaces any prior scheduling order.
16
Event
Deadline
17
Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings
April 8, 2016
Fact discovery cut-off
August 12, 2016
20
Expert disclosures
September 2, 2016
21
Expert rebuttal
September 23, 2016
22
Expert discovery cut-off
October 7, 2016
Deadline to file dispositive motions
October 28, 2016
Pretrial conference statement due
January 10, 2017
Pretrial conference
January 20, 2017 at
2:00 p.m.
Trial
February 13, 2017 at
8:30 a.m.
18
19
23
24
25
26
27
28
Event
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
Deadline
Estimate of trial length (in days)
Eight
Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire
counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely
manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their
calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.
Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant
a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause
to grant a continuance.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 4, 2016
16
17
18
_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?