Braden Partners, LP et al v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company

Filing 31

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 30 JOINT STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Hearing Date and Set Briefing Schedule on Twin City's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Twin City Fire Insurance Company re 25 MOTION to Dis miss Plaintiffs' Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities. Responses due by 7/10/2014. Replies due by 7/31/2014. Motion Hearing set for 8/21/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 19, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2014)

1
2
3

Dean B. Herman (SBN 076752)
Steven S. Son (SBN 265921)
KAUFMAN, DOLOWICH & VOLUCK, LLP
11755 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, California 90025
Tel: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

4
5
6
7

Michael D. Mulvaney (pro hac vice)
Christopher C. Frost (pro hac vice)
MAYNARD, COOPER & GALE, P.C.
1901 Sixth Avenue North
2400 Regions Harbert Plaza
Birmingham, Alabama 35203
Tel: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

8
9

Attorneys for Defendant
TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

BRADEN PARTNERS, LP, et al.,

13
14

Plaintiffs,
v.

15
16
17
18
19

TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 14-cv-01689
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING
DATE AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
TWIN CITY’S MOTION TO DISMISS
PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:

July 24, 2014
2:00 p.m.
9

Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:

April 11, 2014
None Assigned

20
21
22

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
Pursuant to the joint stipulation entered into by and between Plaintiffs Braden Partners, LP

23

and Teijin Pharma USA, LLC (collectively “Plaintiffs”) on the one hand, and Defendant Twin City

24

Fire Insurance Company (“Twin City”) on the other hand, and good cause appearing for the reasons

25

set forth in said joint stipulation, this Court orders:

26

The hearing date on Twin City’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint is continued from

27

July 24, 2014, to August 21, 2014, at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 9 of the United States District Court,

28

Northern District of California, located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102;
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE AND SET BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON TWIN CITY’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT

1
2

Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Twin City’s Motion to Dismiss must be filed and served by July 10,
2014; and

3

Twin City’s Reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss be filed and served by July 31, 2014.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S

RT

ER

12

Ti ga r

A

H

11

R NIA

NO

10

n S.
J u d ge J o

FO

8
9

ED

RDER
__________________________________
IS SO O
IT
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Court Judge

LI

7

Date: June 19, 2014

UNIT
ED

6

RT
U
O

5

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE AND SET BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON TWIN CITY’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT