Boards of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers Local 104 Health Care Plan et al v. Bay Area Balancing and Cleanrooms, Inc.

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER For Continuance of Case Management Conference filed by Bay Area Balancing and Cleanrooms, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 11/18/2014. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/3/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 19, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2014)

Download PDF
1 Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) Erica J. Russell, Esq. (SBN 274494) 2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 882-7900 4 (415) 882-9287 – Facsimile 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 Michele Haydel Gehrke (SBN 215647) Justin T. Curley (SBN 233287) 8 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 560 Mission Street, Suite 3100 9 San Francisco, California 94105 (415) 397-2823 10 (415) 397-8549 – Facsimile 11 12 Attorneys for Defendant 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL 104 17 HEALTH CARE PLAN, et al. 18 Plaintiffs, 19 20 v. BAYAREA BALANCING AND 21 CLEANROOMS, INC., a California corporation, 22 Defendant. 23 Case No.: 14-1739 JST JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; and [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: October 1, 2014 2:00 p.m. 9 (19th Floor) Hon. Jon S. Tigar 24 25 Pursuant to Local Rules 16-2(e) and 7-12, the Parties hereby stipulate and request that the 26 Case Management Conference currently scheduled for October 1, 2014, at 2:00 p.m., in this matter 27 be continued for approximately sixty (60) days, as follows: 28 1. On June 23, 2014, counsel for Defendant appeared in this action. JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; and [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Case No.: 14-1739 JST 1 2. On August 12, 2014, the Parties filed a Stipulated Request to Continue the Case 2 Management Conference scheduled for August 27, 2014, because the result of Plaintiffs’ audit of 3 Defendant’s records was pending with Plaintiffs’ auditors. On August 13, 2014, the Court granted 4 the Parties’ Request and rescheduled the Case Management Conference to October 1, 2014. 5 3. Plaintiffs’ auditors are still in the process of finalizing the audit report. After 6 receipt of the auditors’ report, the Parties will endeavor to resolve this matter without continued 7 litigation. 8 4. There are no issues that need to be addressed by this Court at the currently 9 scheduled Case Management Conference. In the interest of conserving costs as well as the Court’s 10 time and resources, the Parties respectfully request that the Court continue the currently scheduled 11 Case Management Conference for approximately sixty (60) days, to allow for sufficient time for 12 Plaintiffs’ auditors to finalize their audit report and for the Parties to endeavor to resolve this 13 action informally. 14 Dated: September 17, 2014 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 15 By: 17 /s/ Michele R. Stafford Michele R. Stafford Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18 Dated: September 17, 2014 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 16 19 By: 20 /s/ Justin T. Curley Justin T. Curley Attorneys for Defendant 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Based on the foregoing, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the currently set Case 24 Management Conference is hereby continued to December 3, 2014 at 2:00 p.m., and all related H ER R NIA n FO RT J u d ge J o LI NO 28 RED E O ORD _________________________________________ IT IS S THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR UNITED STATES DISTRICTigar COURT S. T A 27 UNIT ED 26 Date: September 19, 2014 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S 25 deadlines are extended accordingly. C F JOINT REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENTN D IS T RIC T O CONFERENCE; and [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Case No.: 14-1739 JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?