St. Martin v. Regents of the University of California, San Francisco et al

Filing 30

ORDER OF DISMISSAL [re 29 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE filed by Girod St. Martin]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 7/2/2015. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

SMITH PATTEN
SPENCER F. SMITH, ESQ. (SBN: 236587)
DOW W. PATTEN, ESQ. (SBN:135931)
221 Main Street, Suite 740
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GIROD ST. MARTIN

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN
FRANCISCO, a public university, and DOES )
)
1-10,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________________ )
)
GIROD ST. MARTIN, an individual,

CASE NO. : 3:14-cv-01765-WHA
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND PROPOSED ORDER

The parties, through their respective counsel of record herein; hereby STIPULATE and
agree that this matter be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety as to all claims and all parties,
each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs, as the parties have settled this matter.

22

SO STIPULATED.

23

Respectfully submitted, this 2nd day of July, 2015

24

SMITH PATTEN

25

/s/ Dow W. Patten
SPENCER F. SMITH, ESQ.
DOW W. PATTEN, ESQ.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GIROD ST. MARTIN

26
27
28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

1

3:14-cv-01765-WHA

1
1

SEDGWICK, LLP

2
2

/s/ Delia Isvoranu
DELIA ISVORANU
Attorneys for Defendant

3
3
4
4
5
5

[PROPOSED] ORDER

6
6

11
11

have settled this matter.
2
SO ORDERED, this ___ day of July, 2015
S DISTRIC

S
UNIT
ED

13
13
14
14

NO

15
15

VED
APPRO

RT

Judge W

ER

H

16
16
17
17

RT
U
O

12
12

TC
TE
__________________________
TA
Hon. William H. Alsup
United States District Judge

R NIA

10
10

up

ls
illiam A

FO

9
9

to all claims and all parties, each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs, as the parties

LI

8
8

Based upon the STIPULATION of the parties, this matter is dismissed with prejudice as

A

7
7

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

18
18
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

2

3:14-cv-01765-WHA