United States of America v. 1.41 Acres of Land et al

Filing 136

ORDER SHORTENING SCHEDULE FOR SUBSTITUTE FACILITY MOTION re 131 MOTION Clarification of Order re 129 Order,,,,, Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings,,,, filed by United States of America, 126 MOTION for a Finding That the Conveyance of a Street Use and Parking Easement is the Reasonably Necessary Substitute Facility filed by United States of America, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 131 MOTION Clarification of Order re 129 Order,,,,, Set Motion and D eadlines/Hearings,,,, , 126 MOTION for a Finding That the Conveyance of a Street Use and Parking Easement is the Reasonably Necessary Substitute Facility . Responses due by 9/21/2015. Replies due by 9/25/2015. Motion Hearing set for 9/25/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 9/16/15. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. ORDER SHORTENING SCHEDULE FOR SUBSTITUTE FACILITY MOTION 1.41 ACRES OF LAND, et al., Defendants. / 15 16 No. C 14-01781 WHA Both sides have filed statements indicating that they have no objection to briefing and 17 hearing both the substitute facility motion and the motion for reconsideration on the same 18 abbreviated schedule. Accordingly, defendants’ oppositions to both motions are due on 19 SEPTEMBER 21, and the replies of the United States, if necessary, are due on SEPTEMBER 25. 20 Both motions shall be heard on SEPTEMBER 30 AT 2:00 P.M., in conjunction with the pre-trial 21 conference already scheduled for that date. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 16, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?