United States of America v. 1.41 Acres of Land et al
Filing
70
REQUEST FOR SUBMISSION. Response due by 3/24/2015 at noon.. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 9, 2015. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2015)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
Plaintiff,
No. C 14-01781 WHA
v.
1.41 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situated
in the City of Alameda, Alameda County, State
of California, and THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its
Department of Parks and Recreation, and the
EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT,
REQUEST FOR SUBMISSION
Defendants.
14
/
15
16
The United States has filed a motion for partial summary judgment, set for a hearing in
17
April 2015. It would be helpful if the parties could please file a joint statement (printed in color
18
with exhibit tabs), appending the following items, by MARCH 24 AT NOON:
19
1.
A map in color with labels for the various items in play (i.e., Alameda Federal
20
Center, vacant parcel, Crown Beach, McKay Avenue, Neptune Pointe). Please clearly highlight
21
(or denote) the boundaries of the property to be condemned (that is, the portion of McKay
22
Avenue at issue here). The Court sees the maps provided by the United States at Dkt. Nos. 56 at
23
9 (color), 56-3 at 39 (color), 56-3 at 57 (black-and-white), 57-1 at 32 (black-and-white), and 1 at
24
6–7 (black-and-white) but it would be helpful to have one (or two) agreed-upon maps that best
25
represent the property at issue. Please print this agreed-upon map on a large posterboard and
26
bring it to the April 2015 hearing.
27
2.
An authenticated copy of the quitclaim deed recorded in 1961.
28
3.
An authenticated copy of the operating agreement between East Bay Regional
Park District and the State of California for Crown Beach and McKay Avenue.
1
2
3
4.
An authenticated copy of the General Services Administration’s “invitation for
bids” in its online auction to sell Neptune Pointe in 2011.
5.
A copy of the proposal submitted to the Office of Management and Budget under
4
the Relocation Program referenced in the declaration of Clark Van Epps (Dkt. No. 56-3,
5
Van Epps Decl. ¶¶ 3–4).
6
6.
The emails appended to the declaration of Charlene Larson (Dkt. No. 56-2,
7
Larson Exhs. A, B) appear to be in response to “emails of October 31, 2008 and
8
November 4, 2008” and an “email of November 10, 2008.” Do we have those emails? If so,
9
please include a copy of those emails.
11
Dated: March 9, 2015.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?