United States of America v. 1.41 Acres of Land et al

Filing 70

REQUEST FOR SUBMISSION. Response due by 3/24/2015 at noon.. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 9, 2015. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 Plaintiff, No. C 14-01781 WHA v. 1.41 ACRES OF LAND, more or less, situated in the City of Alameda, Alameda County, State of California, and THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, acting by and through its Department of Parks and Recreation, and the EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT, REQUEST FOR SUBMISSION Defendants. 14 / 15 16 The United States has filed a motion for partial summary judgment, set for a hearing in 17 April 2015. It would be helpful if the parties could please file a joint statement (printed in color 18 with exhibit tabs), appending the following items, by MARCH 24 AT NOON: 19 1. A map in color with labels for the various items in play (i.e., Alameda Federal 20 Center, vacant parcel, Crown Beach, McKay Avenue, Neptune Pointe). Please clearly highlight 21 (or denote) the boundaries of the property to be condemned (that is, the portion of McKay 22 Avenue at issue here). The Court sees the maps provided by the United States at Dkt. Nos. 56 at 23 9 (color), 56-3 at 39 (color), 56-3 at 57 (black-and-white), 57-1 at 32 (black-and-white), and 1 at 24 6–7 (black-and-white) but it would be helpful to have one (or two) agreed-upon maps that best 25 represent the property at issue. Please print this agreed-upon map on a large posterboard and 26 bring it to the April 2015 hearing. 27 2. An authenticated copy of the quitclaim deed recorded in 1961. 28 3. An authenticated copy of the operating agreement between East Bay Regional Park District and the State of California for Crown Beach and McKay Avenue. 1 2 3 4. An authenticated copy of the General Services Administration’s “invitation for bids” in its online auction to sell Neptune Pointe in 2011. 5. A copy of the proposal submitted to the Office of Management and Budget under 4 the Relocation Program referenced in the declaration of Clark Van Epps (Dkt. No. 56-3, 5 Van Epps Decl. ¶¶ 3–4). 6 6. The emails appended to the declaration of Charlene Larson (Dkt. No. 56-2, 7 Larson Exhs. A, B) appear to be in response to “emails of October 31, 2008 and 8 November 4, 2008” and an “email of November 10, 2008.” Do we have those emails? If so, 9 please include a copy of those emails. 11 Dated: March 9, 2015. For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?