Betancourt v. Advantage Human Resourcing, Inc.
Filing
27
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 26 Proposed Order: SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION filed by Juan Betancourt. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 8, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
JUAN BETANCOURT, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated,
12
Plaintiff,
13
[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER
REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
CLASS CERTIFICATION
vs.
14
Case No. 3:14-cv-01788-JST
ADVANTAGE HUMAN RESOURCING, INC.
(d/b/a ADVANTAGE STAFFING), a corporation;
and DOES 1-10.
15
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
The Court held a Case Management Conference on September 3, 2014, and set the following
schedule for Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification:
21
Deadline for Plaintiff to file a Motion for Class Certification:
April 20, 2015
22
Deadline for Defendants to file an Opposition to Plaintiff’s
Motion for Class Certification:
June 1, 2015
Deadline for Plaintiff to file a Reply in Support of Class
Certification:
June 22, 2015
23
24
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
30
31
Case No. 3:14-cv-01788-JST
1
[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
ER
H
9
RT
8
n S. T
J u d ge J o
NO
7
D
ERE
____________________________________
O ORD
S SJON S. TIGAR
IT I
United States District Judge
N
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
31
i ga r
F
D IS T IC T O
R
11
30
R NIA
6
Dated: September 8, 2014
FO
5
UNIT
ED
4
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
3
in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102.
LI
2
The hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification will be held on July 9, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.
A
1
Case No. 3:14-cv-01788-JST
2
[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?