Kelly Moore Paint Company, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.

Filing 63

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 62 Stipulation of Dismissal. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SARA M. THORPE (SBN: 146529) sthorpe@nicolaidesllp.com GARY A. BARRERA (SBN: 244073) gbarrera@nicolaidesllp.com NICOLAIDES FINK THORPE MICHAELIDES SULLIVAN LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 745-3770 Facsimile: (415) 745-3771 Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA PHILIP L. PILLSBURY, JR. (SBN: 72261) ppillsbury@pillsburycoleman.com INGRID S. LEVERETT (SBN: 148813) ileverett@pillsburycoleman.com PILLSBURY & COLEMAN, LLP 600 Montgomery Street, 31st Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 433-8000 Facsimile: (415)433-4816 Monika Pleyer Lee (SBN: 117019) monikalee@leelawllp.com LEE LAW OFFICES 1700 South El Camino Real, Suite 450 San Mateo, California 94402 Telephone: (650) 212-3400 T Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY, INC. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 21 KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY, INC., 22 23 Plaintiff, Case No. 3:14-CV-01797-MEJ STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER v. 24 25 26 NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, Defendant. 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 1 2 NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, Counterclaimant, 3 4 v. 5 KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY, INC., 6 Counter-defendant. 7 8 9 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff and Counter- 10 defendant KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY, INC. (“Kelly-Moore”) and Defendant and 11 Counterclaimant NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, 12 PA (“National Union”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, on March 20, 2014, Kelly-Moore filed a Complaint in the Superior 13 14 Court in the State of California for the County of San Mateo, titled Kelly-Moore Paint 15 Company, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, et al., Case 16 No. CIV-527420 (the “Action”); WHEREAS, the Action was moved to this Court pursuant to a Notice of Removal 17 18 of Civil Action filed by National Union on April 18, 2014; WHEREAS, on November 10, 2014, National Union filed a Revised 19 20 Counterclaim; WHEREAS, Kelly-Moore and National Union settled this Action on February 20, 21 22 2015; 23 WHEREAS, a Notice of Settlement was filed on February 23, 2015; 24 NOW, THEREFORE, Kelly-Moore and National Union jointly request and 25 26 stipulate to the entry of an Order providing that: 1. All claims asserted by Kelly-Moore against National Union and all 27 counterclaims asserted by National Union against Kelly-Moore are dismissed with 28 prejudice; and STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 1 2 3 4 2. Each of the parties shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees associated with the prosecution and defense of this Action. IT IS SO STIPULATED Dated: May 8, 2015 PILLSBURY & COLEMAN, LLP 5 6 By:_/s/ Philip L. Pillsbury, Jr.________ Philip L. Pillsbury, Jr. Ingrid S. Leverett Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY, INC. 7 8 9 10 11 Dated: May 8, 2015 LEE LAW OFFICES 12 By:__/s/ Monika Pleyer Lee_________ Monika Pleyer Lee Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY, INC 13 14 15 16 17 Dated: May 8, 2015 NICOLAIDES FINK THORPE MICHAELIDES SULLIVAN LLP 18 19 By:__/s/ Sara M. Thorpe___________ Sara M. Thorpe Gary A. Barrera Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED May 8, 2015 Dated: _______________ _____________________________________ Hon. Maria-Elena James Magistrate Judge of the Northern District of California 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?