Kelly Moore Paint Company, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.
Filing
63
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 62 Stipulation of Dismissal. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
SARA M. THORPE (SBN: 146529)
sthorpe@nicolaidesllp.com
GARY A. BARRERA (SBN: 244073)
gbarrera@nicolaidesllp.com
NICOLAIDES FINK THORPE
MICHAELIDES SULLIVAN LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 600
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 745-3770
Facsimile: (415) 745-3771
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA
PHILIP L. PILLSBURY, JR. (SBN: 72261)
ppillsbury@pillsburycoleman.com
INGRID S. LEVERETT (SBN: 148813)
ileverett@pillsburycoleman.com
PILLSBURY & COLEMAN, LLP
600 Montgomery Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 433-8000
Facsimile: (415)433-4816
Monika Pleyer Lee (SBN: 117019)
monikalee@leelawllp.com
LEE LAW OFFICES
1700 South El Camino Real, Suite 450
San Mateo, California 94402
Telephone: (650) 212-3400 T
Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant
KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY, INC.
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
21
KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY, INC.,
22
23
Plaintiff,
Case No. 3:14-CV-01797-MEJ
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
v.
24
25
26
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA,
Defendant.
27
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
1
2
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA,
Counterclaimant,
3
4
v.
5
KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY, INC.,
6
Counter-defendant.
7
8
9
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff and Counter-
10
defendant KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY, INC. (“Kelly-Moore”) and Defendant and
11
Counterclaimant NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH,
12
PA (“National Union”) hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
WHEREAS, on March 20, 2014, Kelly-Moore filed a Complaint in the Superior
13
14
Court in the State of California for the County of San Mateo, titled Kelly-Moore Paint
15
Company, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, et al., Case
16
No. CIV-527420 (the “Action”);
WHEREAS, the Action was moved to this Court pursuant to a Notice of Removal
17
18
of Civil Action filed by National Union on April 18, 2014;
WHEREAS, on November 10, 2014, National Union filed a Revised
19
20
Counterclaim;
WHEREAS, Kelly-Moore and National Union settled this Action on February 20,
21
22
2015;
23
WHEREAS, a Notice of Settlement was filed on February 23, 2015;
24
NOW, THEREFORE, Kelly-Moore and National Union jointly request and
25
26
stipulate to the entry of an Order providing that:
1.
All claims asserted by Kelly-Moore against National Union and all
27
counterclaims asserted by National Union against Kelly-Moore are dismissed with
28
prejudice; and
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
2
1
2
3
4
2.
Each of the parties shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees
associated with the prosecution and defense of this Action.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
Dated: May 8, 2015
PILLSBURY & COLEMAN, LLP
5
6
By:_/s/ Philip L. Pillsbury, Jr.________
Philip L. Pillsbury, Jr.
Ingrid S. Leverett
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY, INC.
7
8
9
10
11
Dated: May 8, 2015
LEE LAW OFFICES
12
By:__/s/ Monika Pleyer Lee_________
Monika Pleyer Lee
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY, INC
13
14
15
16
17
Dated: May 8, 2015
NICOLAIDES FINK THORPE
MICHAELIDES SULLIVAN LLP
18
19
By:__/s/ Sara M. Thorpe___________
Sara M. Thorpe
Gary A. Barrera
Attorneys for Defendant and
Counterclaimant
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED
May 8, 2015
Dated: _______________
_____________________________________
Hon. Maria-Elena James
Magistrate Judge of the Northern District of
California
28
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?