Smith v. Pegatron USA, Inc. et al
Filing
63
ORDER, granting 62 STIPULATION to Reschedule Case Management Conference filed by Joshua Smith. Case Management Statement due by 3/13/2015. Further Case Management Conference reset for 3/20/2015 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/17/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Samuel M. Lasser (SBN - 252754)
samlasser@hotmail.com
LAW OFFICE OF SAMUEL LASSER
1934 Divisadero Street
San Francisco, California 94115
Tel: 415.994.9930
Fax: 415.776.8047
Tod L. Gamlen, State Bar No. 83458
tod.gamlen@bakermckenzie.com
BAKER & McKENZIE LLP
660 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: +1 650 856 2400
Facsimile: +1 856-9299
Jay Edelson (Pro Hac Vice)
jedelson@edelson.com
Rafey S. Balabanian (Pro Hac Vice)
rbalabanian@edelson.com
Benjamin S. Thomassen (Pro Hac Vice)
bthomassen@edelson.com
Amir C. Missaghi (Pro Hac Vice)
amissaghi@edelson.com
EDELSON PC
350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Tel: 312.589.6370
Fax: 312.589.6378
Teresa H. Michaud, State Bar No. 296329
teresa.michaud@bakermckenzie.com
Christina Wong, State Bar No. 288171
christina.wong@bakermckenzie.com
BAKER & McKENZIE LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 11th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3802
Telephone: +1 415 576 3022
Facsimile: +1 415 576 3099
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOSHUA SMITH
13
14
15
Mark D. Taylor (Pro Hac Vice)
mark.taylor@bakermckenzie.com
BAKER & McKENZIE LLP
2001 Ross Avenue
2300 Trammell Crow Center
Dallas, TX 75201
Telephone: +1 214 978 3000
Facsimile: +1 214 978 3099
Attorneys for Defendants
PEGATRON USA, INC., ASROCK
AMERICA, INC., and FATALITY, INC.,
d/b/a FATAL1TY, INC.
16
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
19
20
JOSHUA SMITH, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
21
22
23
24
25
26
Case No. 3:14-cv-01822-CRB
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
v.
PEGATRON USA, INC., a California
corporation, ASROCK AMERICA, INC., a
California corporation, and FATALITY,
INC., d/b/a Fatal1ty, Inc., a Missouri
corporation,
First Amended Complaint Filed: July 3, 2014
Defendants.
27
28
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-01822-CRB
1
Pursuant to the Court’s Standing Order Setting Case Management Conference and Northern
2
District Local Rule 6-2, the Parties hereto, through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as
3
follows:
4
WHEREAS, on November 17, 2014, Plaintiff Joshua Smith (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants
5
Pegatron USA, Inc., ASRock America, Inc., and Fatal1ty, Inc. (“Defendants”) (collectively, the
6
“Parties”) appeared for an initial case management conference. At that time, the Court set a further
7
case management conference for February 20, 2015, with a case management statement due by
8
February 13, 2015. (Dkt. 53.)
9
WHEREAS, subsequent to the initial case management conference, and per the Stipulation
10
and Order Selecting ADR Process, (Dkt. 54), the Parties scheduled a private mediation before Hon.
11
Eugene F. Lynch (Ret.) of JAMS for March 4, 2015.
12
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that they will be in a superior position to present and
13
recommend a schedule to the Court for the remainder of this case following their March 4, 2015
14
mediation.
15
16
WHEREAS, for the convenience of all involved, the Parties stipulate and agree to move
their case management conference schedule as follows:
17
18
STIPULATION
1.
The Parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, respectfully request that their
19
case management conference be moved to March 20, 2015, with a case management statement due
20
by March 13, 2015;
21
22
23
2.
The dates requested in this stipulation will not interfere with any dates previously set
by order of the Court.
3.
All parties agree to the stipulation as indicated by their signatures below. The
24
Parties respectfully request that the Court approve the stipulation, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and
25
enter an Order thereupon. A Proposed Order is filed herewith.
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-01822-CRB
1
2
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: February 13, 2015
3
BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP
By: /s/ Teresa H. Michaud
Teresa H. Michaud
teresa.michaud@bakermckenzie.com
BAKER & McKENZIE LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 11th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel: 415.576.3000
4
5
6
7
Attorneys for Defendant
PEGATRON USA, INC., ASROCK AMERICA,
INC., and FATALITY, INC., d/b/a FATAL1TY, INC.
8
9
10
Dated: February 13, 2015
EDELSON PC
By: /s/ Benjamin S. Thomassen
Benjamin S. Thomassen (Pro Hac Vice)
bthomassen@edelson.com
EDELSON PC
350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Tel: 312.589.6370
Fax: 312.589.6378
11
12
13
14
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOSHUA SMITH
16
17
18
19
20
ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest that concurrence in the
21
22
23
filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.
Dated: February 13, 2015
/s/ Benjamin S. Thomassen
Benjamin S. Thomassen
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
2
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-01822-CRB
1
2
3
4
ORDER
The Court, having considered the above joint request and good cause appearing therefore,
HEREBY ORDERS that:
The next case management conference for this matter will be held on March 20, 2015 at
5
8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. The parties shall submit their case
6
management statement by March 13, 2015.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
UNIT
ED
11
RT
13
har
Judge C
ER
H
14
15
reyer
les R. B
NO
12
R NIA
_______________________
D
HONORABLE O ORDERR. BREYER
CHARLES E
IT IS S
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
FO
Dated: February 17, 2015
LI
10
RT
U
O
9
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
8
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO RESCHEDULE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
3
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-01822-CRB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?