Schock vs City of Lafayette
Filing
30
ORDER VACATING HEARING AND REQUESTING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/27/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
MICHAEL SCHOCK,
Plaintiff,
v.
13
CITY OF LAFAYETTE, et al.,
14
Case No. C 14-1902 RS
ORDER VACATING HEARING AND
REQUESTING ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
Defendants.
____________________________________/
15
16
17
Defendants move to dismiss the complaint in part, and also seek to stay this action pending
18
disposition of criminal proceedings against plaintiff arising from the incident that forms the basis of
19
his claims herein. Defendants invoke both Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971) and Heck v.
20
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) in arguing a stay is warranted. To permit fully-informed
21
consideration of the request for a stay, the motion hearing set for September 4, 2014 is hereby
22
vacated. Within 15 days of the date of this order, the parties shall submit a joint statement setting
23
out the current status of the criminal proceedings and their best estimate as to when those
24
proceedings will be concluded. The pending motion will then be reset for hearing, or submitted
25
without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), in the Court’s discretion.
26
27
28
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
Dated: 8/27/14
4
5
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?