Schock vs City of Lafayette
Filing
33
ORDER STAYING ACTION. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/25/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
MICHAEL SCHOCK,
Plaintiff,
v.
13
ORDER STAYING ACTION
CITY OF LAFAYETTE, et al.,
14
Case No. C 14-1902 RS
Defendants.
____________________________________/
15
16
17
Defendants move to dismiss the complaint in part, and also seek to stay this action pending
18
disposition of criminal proceedings against plaintiff arising from the incident that forms the basis of
19
his claims herein. Defendants invoke both Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971) and Heck v.
20
Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) in arguing a stay is warranted. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b),
21
the matter is suitable for disposition without oral argument.
22
By prior order, the parties were requested to submit a joint statement regarding the status of
23
the criminal proceedings, which they have done. In light of what appears to be substantial
24
uncertainty as to when those proceedings will be concluded, it would be inappropriate to impose an
25
open-ended stay of this action pending any such conclusion. Nevertheless, particularly given the
26
potential impact of the criminal proceedings under Heck (regardless of whether Younger abstention
27
might also be warranted), the circumstances warrant a stay of limited duration. Accordingly, this
28
action is hereby stayed until April 1, 2015 or until conclusion of the criminal proceeding, whichever
1
shall first occur. The parties shall notify the Court immediately upon any conclusion of the criminal
2
proceeding, or shall file a further joint status report on Apri1 1, 2015.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: 9/25/14
8
9
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?