Alvarez et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
20
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 6/26/2014. Signed by Judge Alsup on 6/17/2014. (whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/17/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/17/2014: # 2 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/17/2014: # 3 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
ROBERTA ALVAREZ,
10
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
9
12
13
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
SECOND ORDER
TO SHOW CAUSE
Defendants.
/
14
15
No. C 14-01925 WHA
On June 3, 2014, plaintiff was ordered to show cause why her action should not be
16
dismissed due to deficiencies in her previous Chapter 7 bankruptcies (Dkt. No. 18). On June 4,
17
counsel for plaintiff was informed that she was not admitted to practice in this district and was
18
not registered for electronic case filing access, as required by the local rules (Dkt. No. 19). The
19
deadlines to respond have come and gone.
20
21
22
Plaintiff may have until NOON ON JUNE 26 to file a response to both orders. Failure to do
so may result in dismissal of her action. Rule 41.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: June 17, 2014.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?