Alvarez et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 20

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 6/26/2014. Signed by Judge Alsup on 6/17/2014. (whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2014) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/17/2014: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/17/2014: # 2 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/17/2014: # 3 Certificate/Proof of Service) (dt, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ROBERTA ALVAREZ, 10 Plaintiff, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 9 12 13 v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendants. / 14 15 No. C 14-01925 WHA On June 3, 2014, plaintiff was ordered to show cause why her action should not be 16 dismissed due to deficiencies in her previous Chapter 7 bankruptcies (Dkt. No. 18). On June 4, 17 counsel for plaintiff was informed that she was not admitted to practice in this district and was 18 not registered for electronic case filing access, as required by the local rules (Dkt. No. 19). The 19 deadlines to respond have come and gone. 20 21 22 Plaintiff may have until NOON ON JUNE 26 to file a response to both orders. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of her action. Rule 41. IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 17, 2014. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?