Alvarez et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 22

THIRD ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Alsup on 6/30/2014. (whalc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2014)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
ROBERTA ALVAREZ,

10

Plaintiff,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

9

12
13

v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,

THIRD ORDER
TO SHOW CAUSE

Defendants.
/

14
15

No. C 14-01925 WHA

On June 3, 2014, plaintiff was ordered to show cause why her action should not be

16

dismissed due to deficiencies in her previous Chapter 7 bankruptcies (Dkt. No. 18). On June 4,

17

counsel for plaintiff was informed that she was not admitted to practice in this district and was

18

not registered for electronic case filing access, as required by the local rules (Dkt. No. 19). She

19

failed to respond by the established deadlines, so a second order directed her to respond by June

20

26. She has failed to do so.

21
22
23

Plaintiff may have until NOON ON JULY 10 to file a response. Failure to do so may result
in dismissal of her action. Rule 41. This is her last warning.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: June 30, 2014.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE