United States of America v. Anderson
Filing
9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS SHOULD NOT BE ENFORCED. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 7/24/2014 at 2:00 PM. Show Cause Response due by 7/3/2014. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 23, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2014)
1
6
MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
THOMAS MOORE (ALBN 4305-O78T)
Chief, Tax Division
MICHAEL G. PITMAN (DCBN 484164)
Assistant United States Attorney, Tax Division
450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36055
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone:
(415) 436-6475
Facsimile:
(415) 436-7009
Email: michael.pitman@usdoj.gov
7
Attorneys for the United States of America
2
3
4
5
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
United States of America,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
15
v.
Civil No. 3:14-cv-01932-JST
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVICE SUMMONS SHOULD NOT
BE ENFORCED
Sigurd Anderson,
Respondent.
16
17
Upon consideration of the United States’ Verified Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue
18
Service Summons and the Declaration in support thereof, the Court finds that the United States
19
has established a prima facie case under United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48 (1964) for
20
enforcement of the Internal Revenue Service summons at issue. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
21
ORDERED that Respondent Sigurd Anderson appear before the undersigned United States
22
Magistrate Judge, on the __24th__ day of ____July______, 2014, at __2:00___ a.m./p.m., in
23
Courtroom No. _9_, _19th_ Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San
24
Francisco, California, and then and there show cause, if any, why Respondent should not be
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS
SHOULD NOT BE ENFORCED
CIVIL NO. 3:14-CV-01932-JST
1
compelled to appear and provide documents and testimony as required by the summons.
2
It is further ORDERED that:
3
1.
A copy of this Order, together with the Verified Petition to Enforce Internal
4
Revenue Service Summons and supporting papers, shall be served upon Respondent in
5
accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure at least thirty-five days before
6
the date set for the show-cause hearing;
7
2.
Since the Verified Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Summons and
8
supporting papers make a prima facie showing that the IRS investigation is being conducted for a
9
legitimate purpose, that the inquiry may be relevant to that purpose, that the information sought
10
is not already within the Internal Revenue Service’s possession, and that the administrative steps
11
required by the Internal Revenue Code have been followed, see United States v. Powell, 379 U.S.
12
48 (1964), the burden has shifted to Respondent to oppose enforcement of the summons;
13
3.
If Respondent has any defense to present or opposition to the Petition, such
14
defense or opposition shall be made in writing, filed with the Clerk and served on counsel for the
15
United States, at least 21 days prior to the date set for the show-cause hearing. The United States
16
may file a reply memorandum to any opposition at least 5 court days prior to the date set for the
17
show-cause hearing.
18
4.
At the show-cause hearing, the Court will consider all issues raised by
19
Respondent. Only those issues brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS
SHOULD NOT BE ENFORCED
CIVIL NO. 3:14-CV-01932-JST
2
1
supported by an affidavit or declaration will be considered. Any uncontested allegation in the
2
Petition will be considered admitted.
3
ORDERED this 23rd day of May, 2014.
4
5
__________________________________
THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS
SHOULD NOT BE ENFORCED
CIVIL NO. 3:14-CV-01932-JST
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?