United States of America v. Anderson

Filing 9

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS SHOULD NOT BE ENFORCED. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 7/24/2014 at 2:00 PM. Show Cause Response due by 7/3/2014. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 23, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2014)

Download PDF
1 6 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney THOMAS MOORE (ALBN 4305-O78T) Chief, Tax Division MICHAEL G. PITMAN (DCBN 484164) Assistant United States Attorney, Tax Division 450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36055 San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-6475 Facsimile: (415) 436-7009 Email: michael.pitman@usdoj.gov 7 Attorneys for the United States of America 2 3 4 5 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 United States of America, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 15 v. Civil No. 3:14-cv-01932-JST [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS SHOULD NOT BE ENFORCED Sigurd Anderson, Respondent. 16 17 Upon consideration of the United States’ Verified Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue 18 Service Summons and the Declaration in support thereof, the Court finds that the United States 19 has established a prima facie case under United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48 (1964) for 20 enforcement of the Internal Revenue Service summons at issue. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 21 ORDERED that Respondent Sigurd Anderson appear before the undersigned United States 22 Magistrate Judge, on the __24th__ day of ____July______, 2014, at __2:00___ a.m./p.m., in 23 Courtroom No. _9_, _19th_ Floor, United States District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San 24 Francisco, California, and then and there show cause, if any, why Respondent should not be [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS SHOULD NOT BE ENFORCED CIVIL NO. 3:14-CV-01932-JST 1 compelled to appear and provide documents and testimony as required by the summons. 2 It is further ORDERED that: 3 1. A copy of this Order, together with the Verified Petition to Enforce Internal 4 Revenue Service Summons and supporting papers, shall be served upon Respondent in 5 accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure at least thirty-five days before 6 the date set for the show-cause hearing; 7 2. Since the Verified Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Summons and 8 supporting papers make a prima facie showing that the IRS investigation is being conducted for a 9 legitimate purpose, that the inquiry may be relevant to that purpose, that the information sought 10 is not already within the Internal Revenue Service’s possession, and that the administrative steps 11 required by the Internal Revenue Code have been followed, see United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 12 48 (1964), the burden has shifted to Respondent to oppose enforcement of the summons; 13 3. If Respondent has any defense to present or opposition to the Petition, such 14 defense or opposition shall be made in writing, filed with the Clerk and served on counsel for the 15 United States, at least 21 days prior to the date set for the show-cause hearing. The United States 16 may file a reply memorandum to any opposition at least 5 court days prior to the date set for the 17 show-cause hearing. 18 4. At the show-cause hearing, the Court will consider all issues raised by 19 Respondent. Only those issues brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS SHOULD NOT BE ENFORCED CIVIL NO. 3:14-CV-01932-JST 2 1 supported by an affidavit or declaration will be considered. Any uncontested allegation in the 2 Petition will be considered admitted. 3 ORDERED this 23rd day of May, 2014. 4 5 __________________________________ THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS SHOULD NOT BE ENFORCED CIVIL NO. 3:14-CV-01932-JST 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?