4EC Holdings, LLC v. Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, LLP

Filing 41

ORDER STAYING CASE, aside from Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 5/28/2014. (vclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2014)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 4EC HOLDINGS, LLC, Case No. 14-cv-01944-VC Plaintiff, 5 v. ORDER STAYING CASE 6 7 LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR & SAMPSON, LLP, Re: Docket No. 39 Defendant. 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Upon review of the stipulation and proposed order submitted by the parties to stay the case, the Court orders as follows: 1. Aside from briefing and hearing on the Motion to Remand, proceedings in this 13 action are STAYED to permit the parties an opportunity to pursue settlement discussions. A 14 hearing on the Motion to Remand is set for October 16, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. The plaintiff shall file 15 its reply brief on or before September 25, 2014. Except for the Motion to Remand, all pending 16 motions are DENIED without prejudice and associated filing deadlines and hearing dates are 17 VACATED. The motions may be refiled following a lift of the stay and resolution of the Motion 18 to Remand. Dates associated with the initial case management conference are also VACATED. 19 2. The parties may request referral to a magistrate judge, or a mediator appointed 20 through the Court's ADR program, for settlement purposes. To ensure timely utilization of the 21 Court's dispute resolution resources, the parties should submit this request within 21 days. 22 Regardless, the Court does not envision granting a further continuance of the hearing on the 23 Motion to Remand. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 28, 2014 ______________________________________ VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?