Quinones v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 33

ORDER EXTENDING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 6/19/2014. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 LORI QUINONES, Case No. 14-cv-01948-VC Plaintiff, 6 v. 7 8 J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., ORDER EXTENDING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS ON MOTION TO DISMISS Defendants. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Proceedings on the motion to dismiss continue to be stayed pending the outcome of the 12 ADR phone conference to be held on July 21, 2014. After the ADR unit advises the Court of the 13 outcome of that conference, the Court will issue a further scheduling order. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 19, 2014 ______________________________________ VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Judge 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LORI QUINONES, Case No. 14-cv-01948-VC Plaintiff, 8 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 9 10 J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on 6/19/2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 16 17 Lori Quinones 5221 Stoneham Court Dublin, CA 94568 18 19 20 Dated: 6/19/2014 21 22 Richard W. Wieking Clerk, United States District Court 23 24 25 26 By:________________________ Kristen Melen, Deputy Clerk to the Honorable VINCE CHHABRIA 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?