Bates v. City Of Oakland et al

Filing 48

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BY ALL PARTIES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/6/2015. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 RACHEL LEDERMAN (SBN 130192) Rachel Lederman & Alexsis C. Beach, Attorneys 558 Capp Street San Francisco, CA 94110 Telephone: 415.282.9300; Fax: 415.285.5066 rachel@bllaw.info Attorneys for plaintiff Russell Bates 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 RUSSELL BATES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 CITY OF OAKLAND, ET AL., CASE NO. 3:14-cv-1984 LB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ALL PARTIES Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD, DO HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that pursuant to the terms of the settlement of the entire action reached between the parties, this action shall be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. THEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Court enter the within 21 22 23 24 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Bates v. City of Oakland, et al., Case No. 3:14-cv-1984 LB 1 1 2 voluntary order of dismissal with prejudice; and that the Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for March 12, 2015, be vacated. 3 4 Dated: March 4, 2015 5 BARBARA J. PARKER, City Attorney ARLENE M. ROSEN, Senior Deputy City Attorney By: /S/ Arlene Rosen Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF OAKLAND, et al. 6 7 8 9 10 /S/ RACHEL LEDERMAN Attorney for plaintiff 11 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 12 March 6 Dated: ______________, 2015 13 14 ____________________________________ HON. LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Bates v. City of Oakland, et al., Case No. 3:14-cv-1984 LB 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?