Bates v. City Of Oakland et al
Filing
48
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BY ALL PARTIES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 3/6/2015. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
RACHEL LEDERMAN (SBN 130192)
Rachel Lederman & Alexsis C. Beach, Attorneys
558 Capp Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
Telephone: 415.282.9300; Fax: 415.285.5066
rachel@bllaw.info
Attorneys for plaintiff
Russell Bates
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11
RUSSELL BATES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
CITY OF OAKLAND, ET AL.,
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-1984 LB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO THE
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN ALL PARTIES
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
THE PARTIES, BY AND THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF
RECORD, DO HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE that pursuant to the terms of the
settlement of the entire action reached between the parties, this action shall be dismissed
with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs.
THEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Court enter the within
21
22
23
24
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
Bates v. City of Oakland, et al., Case No. 3:14-cv-1984 LB
1
1
2
voluntary order of dismissal with prejudice; and that the Case Management Conference,
currently scheduled for March 12, 2015, be vacated.
3
4
Dated: March 4, 2015
5
BARBARA J. PARKER, City Attorney
ARLENE M. ROSEN, Senior Deputy City Attorney
By: /S/
Arlene Rosen
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY OF OAKLAND, et al.
6
7
8
9
10
/S/
RACHEL LEDERMAN
Attorney for plaintiff
11
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION,
IT IS SO ORDERED:
12
March 6
Dated: ______________, 2015
13
14
____________________________________
HON. LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
Bates v. City of Oakland, et al., Case No. 3:14-cv-1984 LB
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?