Preston v. City Of Oakland et al
Filing
159
VERDICT FORM. Parties should be prepared to discuss at 9:00 a.m. on 9/21/15. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 9/19/15. (nclc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
DARYELLE LAWANNA PRESTON,
Plaintiff,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
Case No. 14-cv-02022 NC
VERDICT FORM
v.
CITY OF OAKLAND,
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.14-cv-02022 NC
1
The jury must unanimously agree on the answer for each of the following questions;
2
please put an “X” next to the jury’s unanimous answer for each question:
3
California Labor Code
4
1. Did Preston prove by a preponderance of the evidence that she disclosed
5
and/or refused to participate in an act that she reasonably believed violated a
6
state or federal law?
7
Yes _____
No _____
8
If you answered “Yes” to question 1, then answer question 2.
9
If you answered “No” to question 1, please skip to bottom, answer no further
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form.
2. Did Preston prove by a preponderance of the evidence that her disclosure
12
and/or refusal to participate in an act that she reasonably believed violated a
13
state or federal law was a substantial motivating reason for her termination?
14
Yes _____ No _____
15
If you answered “Yes” to question 2, then answer question 3.
16
If you answered “No” to question 2, please skip to bottom, answer no further
17
questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form.
18
3. Did the City of Oakland prove by clear and convincing evidence that it would
19
have discharged Preston, for legitimate, independent reasons, absent her
20
disclosure and/or refusal to participate in an act she reasonably believed
21
violated state or federal law?
22
Yes _____
No _____
23
If you answered “Yes” to question 3, please skip to bottom, answer no further
24
questions, and have the presiding juror sign and date this form.
25
If you answered “No” to question 3, then answer question 4.
26
27
28
Case No. 14-cv-02022 NC
2
1
4. What are Preston’s damages against the City of Oakland?
2
a. Past lost earnings
$_________________
3
b. Future lost earnings
$_________________
4
c. Future pension plan benefits
$_________________
5
d. Emotional distress damages
$_________________
TOTAL:
6
$_________________
7
***
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Signed: _______________________
Dated: __________________
Presiding Juror
12
13
14
After this verdict form has been signed, notify the courtroom deputy that you are
ready to present your verdict in the courtroom.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 14-cv-02022 NC
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?