Randy Stevens, et al -v- Zurich American Insurance Company
Filing
39
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Partial Summary Judgment filed by Zurich American Insurance Company. Any papers in opposition to the Motion shall be served and filed on or before two (2) d ays after Mr. Spohn is released from the hospital and returns to work; and any reply papers in support of the Motion shall be served and filed on or before seven (7) days after Plaintiffs file their Opposition. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 6/17/2015. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2015)
Case3:14-cv-02043-SC Document38 Filed06/11/15 Page1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
Vincent M. Spohn, Esq. (SBN 092334)
vms@v.s7Johnlaw.com
Law Offices of Vincent Martin Spohn, A.P.C.
P.O. Box 5748
Napa, California 94581-0748
Telephone:
(707) 255-1885
Facsimile:
(707) 255-0974
Attorney for Defendants
RANDY STEVENS and ELISSA STEVENS
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RANDY STEVENS, ELISSA STEVENS, dba
FLAMINGO PROPERTIES,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 3:14-cv-02043 SC
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFFS'
OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
DEFENDANT'S REPLY; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Plaintiffs,
V.
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
Plaintiffs RANDY STEVENS, ELISSA STEVENS, dba FLAMINGO PROPERTIES, through
20
21
their counsel Vincent M. Spohn, Esq., hereby request as follows:
22
1. WHEREAS, the deadline for Plaintiffs RANDY STEVENS, ELISSA STEVENS, dba
23
FLAMINGO PROPERTIES to file an Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary
24
Judgment in this instant action is Thursday, June 11, 2015; and
25
26
27
2. WHEREAS, the deadline for Defendant ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY to
.
file a Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment in this
instant action is Thursday, June 18, 2015; and
28
1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No. 3: 14-cv-02043 SC
AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case3:14-cv-02043-SC Document38 Filed06/11/15 Page2 of 4
1
3. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' counsel, Vincent M. Spohn, Esq., had a medical emergency occur on
2
June 9, 2015 and is unavailable to file an Opposition by the deadline of Thursday, June 11,
3
2015; and
4. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' counsel, Vincent M. Spohn, Esq., has been in the hospital since
4
Tuesday, June 9, 2015, and it is not clear when he will be released; and
5
5. WHEREAS, due to Mr. Spohn's medical condition, he has been deprived of the ability to
6
work on Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and
7
6. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' counsel request a new Scheduling Order as follows:
8
9
Two (2) days after
Mr. Spohn is released
From the hospital and returns
10
11
Last Day for Plaintiff to File an
Opposition to Motion for Summary
Judgment
to work
12
Seven (7) days after Plaintiffs file their
Opposition to Motion for Summary
Judgment
July 31,2015
13
14
Last Day for Defendant to File Reply to
Motion for Summary Judgment
Hearing on Defendant's Motion for
Summary Judgment
15
16
7. WHEREAS, Defendant's counsel has agreed to stipulate to the aforementioned scheduling
17
18
order.
19
THEREFORE, Plaintiffs hereby respectfully requests that the Court adopt the aforementioned
20
Scheduling Order.
21
22
Dated: June 11, 2015
LAW OFFICES OF VINCENT M. SPOHN, A.P.C.
23
By
24
Jlct:::. SP~, ~ fn
Attorney for Plaintiffs
RANDY STEVENS and ELISSA STEVENS
25
26
27
Ill
28
Ill
2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY niDGMENT
Case3:14-cv-02043-SC Document38 Filed06/11/15 Page3 of 4
1
Dated: June 11,2015
MOUND COTTON WOLLAN & GREENGRASS LLP
2
3
By Is/ Jonathan Gross
4
JONATHAN GROSS, ESQ.
ELAINE VIDEA, ESQ.
Attorneys for Defendant
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
5
6
7
8
9
CERTIFICATE OF CONCURRENCE
I, Vanessa Beary, for Vincent M Spohn, hereby declare:
Pursuant to Local Rule No. 5-l(i)(3) concurrence in the filing of the document has been
10
obtained from Jonathan Gross to show his signature as Is/ on this pleading in lieu of his physical
11
12
signature on the document.
I declare under penalty of petjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is
13
true and correct and that this declaration is executed at San Francisco, California on June 11, 2015.
14
15
16
17
18
[PROPOSED) ORDER
The Court, having considered the Plaintiffs' request and Defendant's stipulation to Plaintiffs'
19
request to Continue Deadlines for Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment and
20
Defendant's Reply, hereby grants Plaintiffs' request and orders the following:
21
The Scheduling Order for Plaintiffs to File their Opposition to Defendant's Motion for
22
Swnmary Judgment and for Defendant's Reply to Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment shall
23
be as follows:
24
25
26
Two (2) days after
Mr. Spohn is released
From the hospital and returns
to work
Last Day for Plaintiff to File an
Opposition to Motion for Summary
Judgment
Seven (7) days after Plaintiffs flle their
Opposition to Motion for Summary
Last Day for Defendant to File Reply to
Motion for Summary Judgment
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSmON TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case3:14-cv-02043-SC Document38 Filed06/11/15 Page4 of 4
Judgment
1
Hearing on Defendant's Motion for
Summary Judgment
July 31, 2015
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated:
June 17, 2015
HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI
United States District Court Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case No. 3: 14-cv-02043 SC
AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY; [PROPOSED] ORDER'
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?