Randy Stevens, et al -v- Zurich American Insurance Company

Filing 39

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Partial Summary Judgment filed by Zurich American Insurance Company. Any papers in opposition to the Motion shall be served and filed on or before two (2) d ays after Mr. Spohn is released from the hospital and returns to work; and any reply papers in support of the Motion shall be served and filed on or before seven (7) days after Plaintiffs file their Opposition. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 6/17/2015. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2015)

Download PDF
Case3:14-cv-02043-SC Document38 Filed06/11/15 Page1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 Vincent M. Spohn, Esq. (SBN 092334) vms@v.s7Johnlaw.com Law Offices of Vincent Martin Spohn, A.P.C. P.O. Box 5748 Napa, California 94581-0748 Telephone: (707) 255-1885 Facsimile: (707) 255-0974 Attorney for Defendants RANDY STEVENS and ELISSA STEVENS 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDY STEVENS, ELISSA STEVENS, dba FLAMINGO PROPERTIES, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 3:14-cv-02043 SC STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY; [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiffs, V. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiffs RANDY STEVENS, ELISSA STEVENS, dba FLAMINGO PROPERTIES, through 20 21 their counsel Vincent M. Spohn, Esq., hereby request as follows: 22 1. WHEREAS, the deadline for Plaintiffs RANDY STEVENS, ELISSA STEVENS, dba 23 FLAMINGO PROPERTIES to file an Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary 24 Judgment in this instant action is Thursday, June 11, 2015; and 25 26 27 2. WHEREAS, the deadline for Defendant ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY to . file a Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment in this instant action is Thursday, June 18, 2015; and 28 1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case No. 3: 14-cv-02043 SC AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case3:14-cv-02043-SC Document38 Filed06/11/15 Page2 of 4 1 3. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' counsel, Vincent M. Spohn, Esq., had a medical emergency occur on 2 June 9, 2015 and is unavailable to file an Opposition by the deadline of Thursday, June 11, 3 2015; and 4. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' counsel, Vincent M. Spohn, Esq., has been in the hospital since 4 Tuesday, June 9, 2015, and it is not clear when he will be released; and 5 5. WHEREAS, due to Mr. Spohn's medical condition, he has been deprived of the ability to 6 work on Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and 7 6. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' counsel request a new Scheduling Order as follows: 8 9 Two (2) days after Mr. Spohn is released From the hospital and returns 10 11 Last Day for Plaintiff to File an Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment to work 12 Seven (7) days after Plaintiffs file their Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment July 31,2015 13 14 Last Day for Defendant to File Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 15 16 7. WHEREAS, Defendant's counsel has agreed to stipulate to the aforementioned scheduling 17 18 order. 19 THEREFORE, Plaintiffs hereby respectfully requests that the Court adopt the aforementioned 20 Scheduling Order. 21 22 Dated: June 11, 2015 LAW OFFICES OF VINCENT M. SPOHN, A.P.C. 23 By 24 Jlct:::. SP~, ~ fn Attorney for Plaintiffs RANDY STEVENS and ELISSA STEVENS 25 26 27 Ill 28 Ill 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY niDGMENT Case3:14-cv-02043-SC Document38 Filed06/11/15 Page3 of 4 1 Dated: June 11,2015 MOUND COTTON WOLLAN & GREENGRASS LLP 2 3 By Is/ Jonathan Gross 4 JONATHAN GROSS, ESQ. ELAINE VIDEA, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY 5 6 7 8 9 CERTIFICATE OF CONCURRENCE I, Vanessa Beary, for Vincent M Spohn, hereby declare: Pursuant to Local Rule No. 5-l(i)(3) concurrence in the filing of the document has been 10 obtained from Jonathan Gross to show his signature as Is/ on this pleading in lieu of his physical 11 12 signature on the document. I declare under penalty of petjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is 13 true and correct and that this declaration is executed at San Francisco, California on June 11, 2015. 14 15 16 17 18 [PROPOSED) ORDER The Court, having considered the Plaintiffs' request and Defendant's stipulation to Plaintiffs' 19 request to Continue Deadlines for Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment and 20 Defendant's Reply, hereby grants Plaintiffs' request and orders the following: 21 The Scheduling Order for Plaintiffs to File their Opposition to Defendant's Motion for 22 Swnmary Judgment and for Defendant's Reply to Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment shall 23 be as follows: 24 25 26 Two (2) days after Mr. Spohn is released From the hospital and returns to work Last Day for Plaintiff to File an Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment Seven (7) days after Plaintiffs flle their Opposition to Motion for Summary Last Day for Defendant to File Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSmON TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case3:14-cv-02043-SC Document38 Filed06/11/15 Page4 of 4 Judgment 1 Hearing on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment July 31, 2015 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: June 17, 2015 HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI United States District Court Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES FOR PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Case No. 3: 14-cv-02043 SC AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY; [PROPOSED] ORDER'

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?