Hawkes v. Van Loan

Filing 34

ORDER Re 31 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Amend the Complaint by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. The hearing date is vacated and no appearances are required. The Motion is submitted for decision and the parties will be served with the Courts Order deciding the motion.(shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 WAYNE C. HAWKES, Plaintiff, 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 No. C -14-02072(EDL) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT [DKT. 31] v. 11 MARTA D. VAN LOAN, 12 Defendant. / 13 14 Having considered the parties’ respective papers relating to Plaintiff’s Second Motion to 15 Amend the Complaint (“Motion”), the Court finds this matter is appropriate for disposition without a 16 hearing. Accordingly, the hearing date is vacated and no appearances are required. The Motion is 17 submitted for decision and the parties will be served with the Court’s Order deciding the motion. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: September 15, 2014 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Chief Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?